Waldenstedt L, Lundén A, Elwinger K, Thebo P, Uggla A
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Vet Scand. 1999;40(1):11-21. doi: 10.1186/BF03547037.
An experiment was carried out to study the effects of vaccination with Paracox, a live, attenuated vaccine against avian coccidiosis, on broilers isolated from extraneous Eimeria parasites. The study involved 3200 broiler chickens raised in floor pens similar to commercial conditions, but in an initially Eimeria-free environment. Forty percent of the chickens were vaccinated at 3 days of age and given either a basal unmedicated feed or a feed supplemented with the feed antibiotic virginiamycin. Unvaccinated birds were given either the basal feed or feed supplemented either with virginiamycin or the anticoccidial ionophore narasin. At slaughter at 36 days of age vaccinated birds had a lower live weight than non-vaccinated birds. The difference was 4.6% in unmedicated, and 6.0% in virginiamycin medicated chickens. Feed conversion ratio at slaughter was 2.5% higher for unmedicated vaccinated birds, and 1.3% higher for virginiamycin medicated vaccinated birds, compared to respective non-vaccinated groups. There was no significant difference in overall performance of unvaccinated birds given narasin as compared to virginiamycin. At 10 days post vaccination vaccinated birds had a higher number of Clostridium perfringens in the caeca, but there was no difference thereafter. Throughout the experiment, caecal clostridial counts were considerably higher in vaccinated unmedicated birds than in unvaccinated birds given narasin. The number of oocysts shed in the vaccinated groups was very low, but during a subsequent challenge with E. maxima and E. tenella the birds' immunity was found to be satisfactory.
进行了一项实验,以研究使用抗禽球虫病的减毒活疫苗Paracox对从外来艾美耳球虫寄生虫中分离出的肉鸡进行疫苗接种的效果。该研究涉及3200只肉鸡,它们饲养在与商业条件相似的地面围栏中,但处于最初无艾美耳球虫的环境中。40%的鸡在3日龄时接种疫苗,并给予基础未用药饲料或添加饲料抗生素维吉尼亚霉素的饲料。未接种疫苗的鸡则给予基础饲料或添加维吉尼亚霉素或抗球虫离子载体那拉菌素的饲料。在36日龄屠宰时,接种疫苗的鸡的活重低于未接种疫苗的鸡。在未用药的鸡中,差异为4.6%,在使用维吉尼亚霉素的鸡中,差异为6.0%。与各自未接种疫苗的组相比,屠宰时未用药的接种疫苗鸡的饲料转化率高2.5%,使用维吉尼亚霉素的接种疫苗鸡的饲料转化率高1.3%。与维吉尼亚霉素相比,给予那拉菌素的未接种疫苗鸡的总体性能没有显著差异。接种疫苗后10天,接种疫苗的鸡盲肠中的产气荚膜梭菌数量较多,但此后没有差异。在整个实验过程中,未用药的接种疫苗鸡的盲肠梭菌计数显著高于给予那拉菌素的未接种疫苗鸡。接种疫苗组排出的卵囊数量非常低,但在随后用巨型艾美耳球虫和柔嫩艾美耳球虫进行攻毒时,发现鸡的免疫力令人满意。