Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies.
作者信息
McKee M, Britton A, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C
机构信息
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT.
出版信息
BMJ. 1999 Jul 31;319(7205):312-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7205.312.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies.卫生服务研究方法。解读证据：在随机研究和非随机研究之间做出选择。
BMJ. 1999 Jul 31;319(7205):312-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7205.312.
2
[Is mental health services research in need of randomised controlled trials?].[心理健康服务研究是否需要随机对照试验？]
Psychiatr Prax. 2005 Nov;32(8):375-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866911.
3
The patients' perspective is key, also in research.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):581-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.007.
4
Consort 2010 statement on randomised controlled trials.《CONSORT 2010随机对照试验声明》
Ir Med J. 2010 May;103(5):132.
5
Recent progress in health services research: on the need for evidence-based debate.
J Eval Clin Pract. 1998 Nov;4(4):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.tb00084.x.
6
Realism in evidence based medicine: interpreting the randomised controlled trial.循证医学中的现实主义：解读随机对照试验
J Health Organ Manag. 2004;18(2-3):70-81. doi: 10.1108/14777260410538861.
7
Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application.基层医疗中的随机对照试验：范围与应用
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):746-51.
8
A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice.临床实践中患者满意度直接测量指南。
CMAJ. 1992 Oct 1;147(7):989-90.
9
Randomised controlled trials as a driving force of evidence-based public health on the population level.
Perspect Public Health. 2016 Jan;136(1):25-7. doi: 10.1177/1757913915616731.
10
Using randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to test service interventions: issues of standardisation, selection and generalisability.运用随机对照试验（RCTs）来测试服务干预措施：标准化、选择及普遍性问题。
Nurse Res. 2004;11(3):28-42. doi: 10.7748/nr2004.04.11.3.28.c6203.
引用本文的文献
1
Estrogens and breast cancer.雌激素与乳腺癌
Ann Oncol. 2025 Feb;36(2):134-148. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.10.824. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
2
Prognostic effect of a vasopressin V receptor antagonist in acute congestive heart failure patients with hypoperfusion, the wet-cold pattern.血管加压素 V 型受体拮抗剂在低灌注、湿冷证型急性充血性心力衰竭患者中的预后作用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Nov;80(11):1795-1805. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03745-y. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Quantitative bias analysis for external control arms using real-world data in clinical trials: a primer for clinical researchers.临床试验中使用真实世界数据的外部对照臂定量偏倚分析：临床研究人员的入门指南。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Mar;13(3):e230147. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0147. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study.采用观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果与采用随机试验评估的结果比较：一项meta 流行病学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub3.
5
Evaluating the impact of injury prevention interventions in child and adolescent sports using the RE-AIM framework and CERT: A systematic review.运用 RE-AIM 框架和 CERT 评估儿童和青少年运动中预防伤害干预的效果：系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 21;18(7):e0289065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289065. eCollection 2023.
6
Hawthorne Effect: More Than Just Telephones.霍桑效应：远不止电话那么简单。
Ochsner J. 2022 Winter;22(4):286-289. doi: 10.31486/toj.22.5031.
7
Home Treatment for Acute Mental Health Care: Protocol for the Financial Outputs, Risks, Efficacy, Satisfaction Index and Gatekeeping of Home Treatment (FORESIGHT) Study.急性精神卫生保健的居家治疗：居家治疗的财务产出、风险、疗效、满意度指数及守门作用研究（FORESIGHT研究）方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 9;10(11):e28191. doi: 10.2196/28191.
8
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架：对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
9
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架：差距分析、研讨会和咨询知情更新。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
10
Statins to mitigate cardiotoxicity in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis.他汀类药物减轻接受蒽环类药物和/或曲妥珠单抗治疗的癌症患者心脏毒性的效果：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Dec;32(12):1395-1405. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01487-1. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
本文引用的文献
1
Patient preferences in randomised trials: threat or opportunity?随机试验中的患者偏好：威胁还是机遇？
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Oct;1(4):194-7. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100403.
2
The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.不可预测性悖论：随机对照试验与非随机对照试验实证比较的综述
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1185-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1185.
3
Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.随机对照研究与非随机对照研究的选择：一项系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(13):i-iv, 1-124.
4
Are randomized controlled trials controlled? Patient preferences and unblind trials.随机对照试验是可控制的吗？患者偏好与非盲法试验。
J R Soc Med. 1997 Dec;90(12):652-6. doi: 10.1177/014107689709001205.
5
Comparison of carotid endarterectomy outcomes from randomized controlled trials and Medicare administrative databases.
Arch Neurol. 1997 Jul;54(7):826-32. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550190018009.
6
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.为什么我们需要观察性研究来评估医疗保健的有效性。
BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1215-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215.
7
Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease.冠状动脉搭桥术和经皮腔内血管成形术对冠心病患者的长期生存益处。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 May;111(5):1013-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70378-1.
8
Cholesterol lowering and mortality: the importance of considering initial level of risk.降低胆固醇与死亡率：考虑初始风险水平的重要性。
BMJ. 1993 May 22;306(6889):1367-73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1367.
9
The Cochrane Lecture. The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making.考科蓝讲座。至善与善之敌：随机对照试验、不确定性以及评估患者选择在医疗决策中的作用
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):6-15. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.6.
10
Comparison of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping at 10-13 weeks' gestation.孕10至13周时绒毛取样与羊膜穿刺术用于胎儿核型分析的比较。
Lancet. 1994 Aug 13;344(8920):435-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91769-8.
Zotero 插件