Smith G D, Song F, Sheldon T A
Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow.
BMJ. 1993 May 22;306(6889):1367-73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1367.
To investigate the level of risk of death from coronary heart disease above which cholesterol lowering treatment produces net benefits.
Meta-analysis of results of randomised controlled trials of cholesterol lowering treatments.
Published and unpublished data from all identified randomised controlled trials of cholesterol lowering treatments with six months or more follow up and with at least one death were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses were stratified by the rate of death from coronary heart disease in the control arms of the trials.
Death from all causes, from coronary heart disease, and from causes other than coronary heart disease.
In the pooled analysis, net benefit in terms of total mortality from cholesterol lowering was seen only for trials including patients at very high initial risk of coronary heart disease (odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.92). In a medium risk group no net effect was seen, and in the low risk group there were adverse treatment effects (1.22; 1.06 to 1.42). In a weighted regression analysis a significant (p < 0.001) trend of increasing benefit with increasing initial risk of coronary heart disease was shown. Raised mortality from causes other than coronary heart disease was seen in trials of drug treatment (1.21; 1.05 to 1.39) but not in the trials of non-drug treatments (1.02; 0.88 to 1.19). Cumulative meta-analysis showed that these results seem to have been stable as new trials appeared.
Currently evaluated cholesterol lowering drugs seem to produce mortality benefits in only a small proportion of patients at very high risk of death from coronary heart disease. Population cholesterol screening could waste resources and even result in net harm in substantial groups of patients. Overall risk of coronary heart disease should be the main focus of clinical guidelines, and a cautious approach to the use of cholesterol lowering drugs should be advocated. Future trials should aim to clarify the level of risk above which treatment is of net benefit.
研究冠心病死亡风险达到何种程度时,降低胆固醇治疗会产生净效益。
对降低胆固醇治疗的随机对照试验结果进行荟萃分析。
荟萃分析纳入了所有已识别的降低胆固醇治疗随机对照试验的已发表和未发表数据,这些试验随访时间不少于6个月且至少有1例死亡。分析按试验对照组中冠心病死亡率进行分层。
全因死亡、冠心病死亡以及非冠心病原因导致的死亡。
在汇总分析中,仅在纳入冠心病初始风险非常高的患者的试验中,降低胆固醇治疗在总死亡率方面显示出净效益(比值比0.74;95%置信区间0.60至0.92)。在中等风险组中未观察到净效应,而在低风险组中存在不良治疗效应(1.22;1.06至1.42)。加权回归分析显示,随着冠心病初始风险增加,效益增加的趋势显著(p<0.001)。在药物治疗试验中观察到非冠心病原因导致的死亡率升高(1.21;1.05至1.39),但在非药物治疗试验中未观察到(1.02;0.88至1.19)。累积荟萃分析表明,随着新试验的出现,这些结果似乎保持稳定。
目前评估的降低胆固醇药物似乎仅在冠心病死亡风险非常高的一小部分患者中产生死亡率效益。人群胆固醇筛查可能会浪费资源,甚至对相当一部分患者造成净危害。冠心病的总体风险应成为临床指南的主要关注点,并应提倡谨慎使用降低胆固醇药物。未来的试验应旨在明确治疗产生净效益的风险水平。