Nicolaides K, Brizot M de L, Patel F, Snijders R
Harris Birthweight Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital Medical School, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Lancet. 1994 Aug 13;344(8920):435-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91769-8.
We did a prospective study of women with singleton viable pregnancies at 10-13 weeks' gestation who requested first-trimester fetal karyotyping because of advanced maternal age, parental anxiety, or family history of chromosomal abnormality. Women were counselled as to the available options of non-invasive screening or invasive testing by mid-trimester amniocentesis, early amniocentesis (EA), or chorionic villus sampling (CVS), or randomisation to EA or CVS at 10-13 weeks. EA was done in 731 patients (493 by choice and 238 by randomisation) and CVS in 570 (320 by choice and 250 by randomisation). Both procedures were done by transabdominal ultrasound-guided insertion of a 20-gauge needle. The rate of successful sampling was the same for both procedures (97.5%). Spontaneous loss (intrauterine or neonatal death) was significantly higher after EA (total group mean = 5.3%, 95% CI 3.8-7.2; randomised subgroup mean = 5.9%, 3.3-9.7) than after CVS (total group: mean = 2.3%, 1.2-3.9; randomised subgroup: mean = 1.2%, 0.3-3.5). The gestation at delivery and birthweight of the infants after EA and CVS were similar. In the EA group the incidence of talipes equinovarus (1.63%), was higher than in the CVS group (0.56%), but this difference was not significant.
我们对妊娠10 - 13周的单胎存活妊娠女性进行了一项前瞻性研究,这些女性因母亲年龄较大、父母焦虑或染色体异常家族史而要求进行孕早期胎儿染色体核型分析。我们向这些女性咨询了非侵入性筛查或侵入性检测的可用选项,包括孕中期羊膜穿刺术、早期羊膜穿刺术(EA)或绒毛取样(CVS),或者在10 - 13周时随机分配接受EA或CVS。731例患者接受了EA(493例为自主选择,238例为随机分配),570例接受了CVS(320例为自主选择,250例为随机分配)。两种操作均通过经腹超声引导插入20号针进行。两种操作的成功取样率相同(97.5%)。EA后自发流产(宫内或新生儿死亡)的发生率显著高于CVS(总体组均值 = 5.3%,95% CI 3.8 - 7.2;随机分组亚组均值 = 5.9%,3.3 - 9.7)(CVS总体组:均值 = 2.3%,1.2 - 3.9;随机分组亚组:均值 = 1.2%,0.3 - 3.5)。EA和CVS后婴儿的分娩孕周和出生体重相似。EA组马蹄内翻足的发生率(1.63%)高于CVS组(0.56%),但差异不显著。