Schubert C, Knobeloch L, Kanarek M S, Anderson H A
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53705-2397, USA.
Arch Environ Health. 1999 Jul-Aug;54(4):242-7. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602481.
The authors conducted a survey by mail of Wisconsin families who had their well water tested for nitrate to (a) assess their awareness and compliance with the state's health advisories for nitrate, (b) evaluate their reaction(s) to their test results, and (c) compare demographic differences between exposure levels. Owners of contaminated wells (i.e., > 12.9 mg/l nitrate-nitrogen) were more likely to have lived on a farm, had lower annual incomes, and had older and shallower wells than families whose wells were low in nitrate (i.e., < 2.0 mg/l nitrate-nitrogen). Most respondents were aware of the advisories for pregnant women and infants and, in accordance with these advisories, the majority of families with nitrate-contaminated drinking water took no remedial action. Given that many rural families consume nitrate-contaminated water daily, scientists should conduct additional research to determine whether chronic ingestion of nitrate-contaminated water poses a significant health threat to these families.
作者通过邮件对威斯康星州那些对井水进行过硝酸盐检测的家庭展开了一项调查,目的是:(a)评估他们对该州硝酸盐健康建议的知晓程度及遵守情况;(b)评估他们对检测结果的反应;(c)比较不同暴露水平下的人口统计学差异。与井水硝酸盐含量低(即硝酸盐氮含量<2.0mg/l)的家庭相比,受污染井水(即硝酸盐氮含量>12.9mg/l)的所有者更有可能住在农场,年收入较低,并且水井更老旧、更浅。大多数受访者知晓针对孕妇和婴儿的建议,并且根据这些建议,大多数饮用水受硝酸盐污染的家庭未采取任何补救措施。鉴于许多农村家庭每天都饮用受硝酸盐污染的水,科学家应开展更多研究,以确定长期摄入受硝酸盐污染的水是否会对这些家庭构成重大健康威胁。