• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过氧化合物对耐戊二醛分枝杆菌的疗效。

Efficacy of peroxygen compounds against glutaraldehyde-resistant mycobacteria.

作者信息

Stanley P M

机构信息

Minntech Corporation, Minneapolis, MN 55447, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 1999 Aug;27(4):339-43. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70054-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70054-4
PMID:10433673
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To prevent cross-infection of patients, semicritical devices must be high-level disinfected by a product capable of destroying mycobacteria. Glutaraldehyde is commonly used; however, recent studies showed that glutaraldehyde-resistant mycobacteria could survive treatment with this chemical for extended exposure times. Our study tested hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, and a germicide (Cidex PA, Advanced Sterilization Products, Irvine, Calif) containing a mixture of the 2 peroxygen compounds for their ability to kill both glutaraldehyde-resistant and nonresistant (control) mycobacteria.

METHODS

Bacterial suspensions were exposed to the test chemicals for various periods followed by neutralization and enumeration of survivors.

RESULTS

Hydrogen peroxide at 10% and acidified hydrogen peroxide at 6% had low activity (<4 log reduction in 60 minutes exposure) against glutaraldehyde-resistant strains and slightly higher activity (4 log to 6 log reduction in 60 minutes) against the control strains. Peracetic acid at 0.07% had low to moderate activity (0.6 log to 6 log reduction in 60 minutes) against the resistant organisms and moderate to high activity (4 log to 6 log reduction in 10 minutes) against the control strains. Cidex PA, which contains a mixture of 0.07% peracetic acid and 1% hydrogen peroxide, had high activity (6 log reduction in 10 minutes) against all organisms. Efficacy of 0.8% phenol, a standard reference solution, did not correlate with efficacy of the peroxygen compounds.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid had much higher activity toward mycobacteria when combined as a synergistic mixture than when evaluated individually.

摘要

背景

为防止患者发生交叉感染,半关键器械必须使用能够杀灭分枝杆菌的产品进行高水平消毒。戊二醛是常用的消毒剂;然而,最近的研究表明,耐戊二醛的分枝杆菌在长时间接触这种化学物质后仍能存活。我们的研究测试了过氧化氢、过氧乙酸以及一种含有这两种过氧化物混合物的杀菌剂(Cidex PA,Advanced Sterilization Products,加利福尼亚州欧文市)对耐戊二醛和非耐戊二醛(对照)分枝杆菌的杀灭能力。

方法

将细菌悬液暴露于测试化学物质中不同时间段,随后进行中和并计数存活菌数。

结果

10%的过氧化氢和6%的酸化过氧化氢对耐戊二醛菌株的活性较低(暴露60分钟减少<4个对数级),对对照菌株的活性略高(暴露60分钟减少4至6个对数级)。0.07%的过氧乙酸对耐药菌的活性低至中等(暴露60分钟减少0.6至6个对数级),对对照菌株的活性中等至高(暴露10分钟减少4至6个对数级)。含有0.07%过氧乙酸和1%过氧化氢混合物的Cidex PA对所有菌株均具有高活性(暴露10分钟减少6个对数级)。标准参考溶液0.8%苯酚的效力与过氧化物化合物的效力不相关。

结论

过氧化氢和过氧乙酸作为协同混合物组合时,对分枝杆菌的活性比单独评估时高得多。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of peroxygen compounds against glutaraldehyde-resistant mycobacteria.过氧化合物对耐戊二醛分枝杆菌的疗效。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Aug;27(4):339-43. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70054-4.
2
Disinfectant Susceptibility Profiling of Glutaraldehyde-Resistant Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.戊二醛抗性非结核分枝杆菌的消毒剂药敏分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;38(7):784-791. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.75. Epub 2017 May 2.
3
Sporicidal activity of sodium dichloroisocyanurate, peroxygen and glutaraldehyde disinfectants against Bacillus subtilis.二氯异氰尿酸钠、过氧化物和戊二醛消毒剂对枯草芽孢杆菌的杀孢子活性。
J Hosp Infect. 1996 Apr;32(4):283-94. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(96)90039-0.
4
Mycobactericidal activity of selected disinfectants using a quantitative suspension test.采用定量悬液试验检测选定消毒剂的杀分枝杆菌活性。
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Feb;41(2):111-21. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90048-8.
5
In-vitro evaluation of Perasafe compared with 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde against Mycobacterium spp.与2%碱性戊二醛相比,Perasafe对分枝杆菌属的体外评估
J Hosp Infect. 2003 May;54(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00037-9.
6
Antimicrobial effectiveness of 2% glutaraldehyde versus other disinfectants for hospital equipment, in an in vitro test based on germ-carriers with a high microbial contamination.在基于高微生物污染菌载体的体外试验中,2%戊二醛与其他消毒剂对医院设备的抗菌效果比较
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1999 Dec;100(6):299-305.
7
Ortho-phthalaldehyde: a possible alternative to glutaraldehyde for high level disinfection.邻苯二甲醛:一种可能替代戊二醛用于高水平消毒的物质。
J Appl Microbiol. 1999 Jun;86(6):1039-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00791.x.
8
Efficacy of high-level disinfectants for reprocessing GI endoscopes in simulated-use testing.高水平消毒剂在模拟使用测试中对胃肠内镜再处理的效果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Apr;53(4):456-62. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.113380.
9
Evaluation of microbicidal activity of a new disinfectant: Sterilox 2500 against Clostridium difficile spores, Helicobacter pylori, vancomycin resistant Enterococcus species, Candida albicans and several Mycobacterium species.一种新型消毒剂Sterilox 2500对艰难梭菌孢子、幽门螺杆菌、耐万古霉素肠球菌、白色念珠菌和几种分枝杆菌的杀菌活性评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Feb;41(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90046-4.
10
Mycobacterium massiliense BRA100 strain recovered from postsurgical infections: resistance to high concentrations of glutaraldehyde and alternative solutions for high level disinfection.从术后感染中分离出的马赛分枝杆菌BRA100菌株:对高浓度戊二醛的耐药性及高水平消毒的替代解决方案
Acta Cir Bras. 2010 Oct;25(5):455-9. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502010000500013.

引用本文的文献

1
Disinfectant Susceptibility Profiling of Glutaraldehyde-Resistant Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.戊二醛抗性非结核分枝杆菌的消毒剂药敏分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;38(7):784-791. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.75. Epub 2017 May 2.
2
The bactericidal activity of glutaraldehyde-impregnated polyurethane.戊二醛浸渍聚氨酯的杀菌活性
Microbiologyopen. 2016 Oct;5(5):891-897. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.378. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?过氧乙酸是否适用于软式内镜再处理的清洗步骤?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):390-406. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.390.