• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告医院患者调查的对比结果。

Reporting comparative results from hospital patient surveys.

作者信息

Rogers G, Smith D P

机构信息

Massachusetts Health Quality Partnership, Boston 02115, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;11(3):251-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.251.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/11.3.251
PMID:10435847
Abstract

Externally-reported assessments of hospital quality are in increasing demand, as consumers, purchasers, providers, and public policy makers express growing interest in public disclosure of performance information. This article presents an analysis of a groundbreaking program in Massachusetts to measure and disseminate comparative quality information about patients' hospital experiences. The article emphasizes the reporting structure that was developed to address the project's dual goals of improving the quality of care delivered statewide while also advancing public accountability. Numerous trade-offs were encountered in developing reports that would satisfy a range of purchaser and provider constituencies. The final result was a reporting framework that emphasized preserving detail to ensure visibility for each participating hospital's strengths as well as its priority improvement areas. By avoiding oversimplification of the results, the measurement project helped to support a broad range of successful improvement activity statewide.

摘要

随着消费者、采购方、医疗服务提供者和公共政策制定者对公开披露医疗表现信息的兴趣日益浓厚,外界对医院质量评估的需求也在不断增加。本文对马萨诸塞州一项开创性计划进行了分析,该计划旨在衡量并传播有关患者医院体验的比较质量信息。文章强调了为实现该项目的双重目标而制定的报告结构,这两个目标分别是提高全州范围内的医疗质量以及增强公共问责制。在制定能满足一系列采购方和医疗服务提供方群体需求的报告时,遇到了诸多权衡。最终结果是形成了一个报告框架,该框架强调保留细节,以确保各参与医院的优势及其优先改进领域都能得到展现。通过避免对结果过度简化,该评估项目有助于在全州范围内支持广泛的成功改进活动。

相似文献

1
Reporting comparative results from hospital patient surveys.报告医院患者调查的对比结果。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;11(3):251-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.251.
2
Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.平衡问责与改进:来自马萨诸塞州的案例研究
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 May;26(5):299-312. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0.
3
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
4
Consumer information, patient satisfaction surveys, and public reports.消费者信息、患者满意度调查及公开报告。
Am J Med Qual. 1996 Spring;11(1):S42-5.
5
Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?公布医院绩效是否会刺激质量改进工作?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):84-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.84.
6
Public reporting of hospital patient satisfaction: the Rhode Island experience.医院患者满意度的公开报告:罗德岛的经验
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):51-70.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Purchaser strategies to influence quality of care: from rhetoric to global applications.购买者影响医疗质量的策略:从言辞到全球应用
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):171-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014373.
9
Hospital response to public reporting of quality indicators.医院对质量指标公开报告的回应。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):61-76.
10
Physician executives must leap with the frog. Accountability for safety and quality ultimately lie with the doctors in charge.医师管理人员必须与青蛙一起跳跃。安全和质量的最终责任在于主管医生。
Physician Exec. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):14-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Patient Perceptions Towards Direct Primary Care: A Focus Group Study.了解患者对直接初级保健的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Aug 1;9:23743735221117359. doi: 10.1177/23743735221117359. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and Validation of a Brief Hospital-Based Ambulatory Patient Experience Survey Tool.一种基于医院的简短门诊患者体验调查工具的开发与验证
Healthc Policy. 2019 Nov;15(2):100-114. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25968.
3
Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement.患者满意度调查作为提高质量的一种工具。
Oman Med J. 2014 Jan;29(1):3-7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.02.
4
Do patient surveys work? The influence of a national survey programme on local quality-improvement initiatives.患者调查有用吗?一项全国性调查计划对地方质量改进举措的影响。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):437-41. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022749.
5
Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.倾听患者的声音?影响在质量改进中使用患者调查数据的因素。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):428-32. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012955.
6
Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care.关于用于收集医院患者护理感知数据的调查工具的文献综述。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):1996-2017. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00475.x.
7
Factors that influence line managers' perceptions of hospital performance data.影响直线经理对医院绩效数据认知的因素。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):261-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00115.
8
The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.患者调查的重要性日益凸显。既然已有完善的方法,患者调查就能促进改善。
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):720-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.720.