• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交际能力与心智/大脑的结构。

Communicative competence and the architecture of the mind/brain.

作者信息

Tirassa M

机构信息

Centro di Scienza Cognitiva, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1999 Jul;68(3):419-41. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2121.

DOI:10.1006/brln.1999.2121
PMID:10441187
Abstract

Cognitive pragmatics is concerned with the mental processes involved in intentional communication. I discuss a few issues that may help clarify the relationship between this area and the broader cognitive science and the contribution that they give, or might give, to each other. Rather than dwelling on the many technicalities of the various theories of communication that have been advanced, I focus on the different conceptions of the nature and the architecture of the mind/brain that underlie them. My aims are, first, to introduce and defend mentalist views of communication in general; second, to defend one such view, namely that communication is a cognitive competence, that is, a faculty, and the underlying idea that the architecture of the mind/brain is domain-specific; and, third, to review the (scarce) neuropsychological evidence that bears on these issues.

摘要

认知语用学关注有意交流中所涉及的心理过程。我将探讨一些问题,这些问题可能有助于厘清该领域与更广泛的认知科学之间的关系,以及它们相互之间已经做出或可能做出的贡献。我不会详述已提出的各种交流理论的诸多技术细节,而是关注这些理论背后关于心智/大脑的本质和结构的不同概念。我的目标,首先是总体上介绍和捍卫关于交流的心智主义观点;其次是捍卫其中一种观点,即交流是一种认知能力,也就是一种官能,以及心智/大脑结构具有领域特异性这一基本观点;第三是审视与这些问题相关的(稀少的)神经心理学证据。

相似文献

1
Communicative competence and the architecture of the mind/brain.交际能力与心智/大脑的结构。
Brain Lang. 1999 Jul;68(3):419-41. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2121.
2
Development and decay of extra-linguistic communication.非语言交流的发展与衰退
Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):21-7.
3
Cognitive pragmatics of language disorders in adults.成人语言障碍的认知语用学
Semin Speech Lang. 2007 May;28(2):111-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970569.
4
Experimental pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language.实验语用学:语言研究中的格莱斯转向。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Nov;12(11):425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.009.
5
The mind beyond our immediate awareness: Freudian, Jungian, and cognitive models of the unconscious.超越我们即时意识的心智:弗洛伊德、荣格和认知无意识模型。
J Anal Psychol. 2004 Nov;49(5):657-82. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8774.2004.00494.x.
6
Neuropragmatics: extralinguistic communication after closed head injury.神经语用学:闭合性颅脑损伤后的非语言交流
Brain Lang. 2001 Apr;77(1):72-94. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2430.
7
Domain-specificity and theory of mind: evaluating neuropsychological evidence.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Dec;9(12):572-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
8
Cognitive accuracy and intelligent executive function in the brain and in business.大脑与商业中的认知准确性和智能执行功能。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:122-41. doi: 10.1196/annals.1412.011. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
9
Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: a complete pragmatic assessment.创伤性脑损伤中的交流障碍:全面的语用评估
Brain Lang. 2008 Dec;107(3):229-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
10
Individual differences in working memory.工作记忆中的个体差异。
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.002. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
What are they all doing in that restaurant? Perspectives on the use of theory of mind.他们都在那家餐馆里做什么?关于心理理论运用的观点。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 23;15:1507298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1507298. eCollection 2024.
2
Pragmatic Communication Deficit and Functional Outcome in Patients with Right- and Left-Brain Damage: A Pilot Study.右脑和左脑损伤患者的语用交流缺陷与功能结局:一项初步研究
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 16;14(4):387. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040387.
3
Why Pragmatics and Theory of Mind Do Not (Completely) Overlap.为何语用学与心理理论并不(完全)重叠。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;9:1453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01453. eCollection 2018.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale in a Sample of Adolescents and Adults.青少年和成年人样本中心智理论评估量表的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:566. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00566. eCollection 2016.
5
Biological Agency: Its Subjective Foundations and a Large-Scale Taxonomy.生物能动性:其主观基础与大规模分类法
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 8;7:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00041. eCollection 2016.
6
"No more a child, not yet an adult": studying social cognition in adolescence.“不再是儿童,尚未成年”:青少年社会认知研究
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 21;6:1011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01011. eCollection 2015.
7
Neural Insights into the Relation between Language and Communication.对语言与交流之间关系的神经学见解。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Oct 25;4:203. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00203. eCollection 2010.