Rodriguez C M, Sutherland D
Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University West, Phoenix 85069-7100, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 1999 Jul;23(7):651-7. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(99)00043-5.
This study examined how childhood history of discipline (1) related to ratings of how severe and typical punishments were; and (2) predicted parents' use of discipline techniques. The influence of child culpability on these ratings was also investigated.
Ninety-nine New Zealand parents rated 12 physical discipline scenarios varying in discipline severity and perceived child culpability. Parents judged how severe and typical they considered the disciplines depicted in the scenarios and reported on how often they had experienced such discipline as children and how often they had used them with their own children.
When the child was perceived to be at fault, parents rated the discipline depicted as less severe, considered the technique more typical, reported they had been similarly disciplined more frequently, and applied such discipline to their child more frequently. Childhood history of a discipline was related to the parent's use of that method, and the parents judged techniques they used with their own children as less severe and more typical of methods of discipline. History of discipline and severity judgments were the best predictors of parents' disciplinary practices.
Although the findings support the cycle of violence theory, more complex potential pathways to abusive parenting, including the variables in this study, are proposed.
本研究探讨了童年时期的管教经历(1)与对惩罚的严重程度和典型程度的评分之间的关系;以及(2)如何预测父母对管教技巧的使用。同时还研究了儿童应受责备程度对这些评分的影响。
99位新西兰父母对12个体罚场景进行了评分,这些场景在管教严重程度和儿童应受责备程度方面各不相同。父母们判断他们认为场景中所描绘的管教有多严重和典型,并报告他们在童年时期经历过这种管教的频率,以及他们对自己孩子使用这种管教方式的频率。
当认为孩子有错时,父母对所描绘的管教评分较低,认为这种技巧更典型,报告他们更频繁地经历过类似的管教,并且更频繁地对自己的孩子使用这种管教方式。童年时期的管教经历与父母对该方法的使用有关,并且父母认为他们对自己孩子使用的技巧不那么严厉,且更具管教方法的典型性。管教经历和严重程度判断是父母管教行为的最佳预测因素。
尽管研究结果支持暴力循环理论,但本文提出了包括本研究中的变量在内的更复杂的虐待性养育潜在途径。