• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration on the use of community-based services.医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目对社区服务使用情况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Aug;34(3):645-67.
2
Effects of the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration on caregiver burden and depression.医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目对照料者负担和抑郁的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Aug;34(3):669-89.
3
Effects of the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration on nursing home entry.医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目对养老院入住情况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Aug;34(3):691-714.
4
The effects of predetermined payment rates for Medicare home healthcare.医疗保险家庭医疗保健预定支付率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1997 Oct;32(4):397-414.
5
How does Cash and Counseling affect costs?现金与咨询如何影响成本?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 2):488-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00680.x.
6
The Medicare Alzheimer's demonstration project in the greater Cincinnati area.
Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care. 1989 Fall;8(4):22-7.
7
Caregivers' utilization of health services: results from the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration, Illinois site.护理人员对医疗服务的利用:伊利诺伊州医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目的结果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Dec;49(12):1600-5.
8
The net effects of the Project NetWork return-to-work case management experiment on participant earnings, benefit receipt, and other outcomes.项目网络重返工作岗位病例管理实验对参与者收入、福利领取及其他结果的净影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(1):12-33.
9
The evaluation of the National Long Term Care Demonstration. 1. An overview of the channeling demonstration and its evaluation.国家长期护理示范项目评估。1. 分流示范项目概述及其评估。
Health Serv Res. 1988 Apr;23(1):1-22.
10
Case management styles for people with AD: do the differences make a difference?
Geriatrics. 1997 Sep;52 Suppl 2:S44-7.

引用本文的文献

1
An integrative review of measures of transitions and care coordination for persons living with dementia and their caregivers.对痴呆症患者及其照护者的过渡措施与照护协调的综合综述。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023 Aug 6;9(3):e12391. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12391. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
Components of case management in caring for patients with dementia: a mixed-methods study.痴呆患者护理中病例管理的组成部分:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun 23;21(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00935-w.
3
Outcomes of remote activity monitoring for persons living with dementia over an 18-month period.18个月期间痴呆症患者远程活动监测的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Aug;70(8):2439-2442. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17839. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
The ResidentialCare Transition Module: a single-blinded randomized controlled evaluation of a telehealth support intervention for family caregivers of persons with dementia living in residential long-term care.《住宅护理过渡模块:针对居住在长期护理住宅中的痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员的远程医疗支持干预的单盲随机对照评估》
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01542-7.
5
Health Services Utilization in Older Adults with Dementia Receiving Care Coordination: The MIND at Home Trial.老年痴呆症患者接受护理协调后的卫生服务利用:MIND at Home 试验。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb;53(1):556-579. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12647. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
6
Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia.针对痴呆症患者居家支持的个案管理方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008345.pub2.
7
Barriers to implementation of case management for patients with dementia: a systematic mixed studies review.痴呆症患者病例管理实施的障碍:系统混合研究综述
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;12(5):456-65. doi: 10.1370/afm.1677.
8
Introducing case management for people with dementia in primary care: a mixed-methods study.在初级保健中为痴呆症患者引入病例管理:一项混合方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):e735-41. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682333.
9
Case management for dementia in primary health care: a systematic mixed studies review based on the diffusion of innovation model.初级卫生保健中的痴呆病例管理:基于创新扩散模型的系统混合研究综述。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jun 11;9:915-28. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S64723. eCollection 2014.
10
Respite care for people with dementia and their carers.为痴呆症患者及其护理人员提供的临时护理服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 16;2014(1):CD004396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004396.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration on nursing home entry.医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目对养老院入住情况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Aug;34(3):691-714.
2
Caregiver supports: outcomes from the Medicare Alzheimer's disease demonstration.照顾者支持:医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目的成果
Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Winter;19(2):97-117.
3
Predictors of in-home and out-of-home service use by family caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients.
J Aging Health. 1993 Nov;5(4):419-38. doi: 10.1177/089826439300500401.
4
Living alone with Alzheimer's disease: effects on health and social service utilization patterns.患阿尔茨海默病后独居:对健康及社会服务利用模式的影响
Gerontologist. 1994 Feb;34(1):8-14. doi: 10.1093/geront/34.1.8.
5
Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.老年人评估:日常生活中的自我维持和工具性活动
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86.
6
Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States.美国医疗服务利用的社会和个体决定因素。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):95-124.
7
The impact of in-home services termination on family caregivers.
Gerontologist. 1985 Apr;25(2):141-5. doi: 10.1093/geront/25.2.141.
8
Families, informal supports, and Alzheimer's disease. Current research and future agendas.家庭、非正式支持与阿尔茨海默病。当前研究与未来议程。
Res Aging. 1985 Dec;7(4):623-44. doi: 10.1177/0164027585007004008.
9
Caregivers to dementia patients: the utilization of community services.
Gerontologist. 1987 Apr;27(2):209-14. doi: 10.1093/geront/27.2.209.
10
Predicting the volume of health and social services: integrating cognitive impairment into the modified Andersen framework.预测健康和社会服务的需求量:将认知障碍纳入修正后的安德森框架
Gerontologist. 1992 Feb;32(1):33-43. doi: 10.1093/geront/32.1.33.

医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目对社区服务使用情况的影响。

Effects of the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration on the use of community-based services.

作者信息

Newcomer R, Spitalny M, Fox P, Yordi C

机构信息

Dept. of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0612, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1999 Aug;34(3):645-67.

PMID:10445896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089031/
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Did the Medicare Alzheimer's Disease Demonstration with its case management and community service waivers affect the use of community-based long-term care services among people with dementia and their primary caregivers?

DATA SOURCES

Baseline and periodic caregiver interviews. Measures include client and caregiver attributes and self-reported service use.

STUDY DESIGN

The demonstration randomly assigned voluntary applicants into treatment and control groups. Treatment group cases were eligible for case management and for up to $699 per month in community care benefits. The actual monthly entitlement varied among the eight demonstration communities due to regional cost and inflation adjustments over time. Analyses are for the year after enrollment.

DATA COLLECTION

Analyses are of cases surviving six months or more in the community after enrollment (n = 5,209). Cases received baseline and semi-annual assessments.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The intervention of case management and community service reimbursement had a strong, consistent, and positive effect on the likelihood of using home care (including homemaker/chore services, personal care services, companion services) and adult day care. Treatment group clients were at least twice as likely as control group clients to be using any of the four community-based services. A similar, but less pervasive effect was achieved with caregiver training and support group participation. Reimbursement provided by the demonstration's Medicare waiver was generally not sufficient to exceed the level of control group service acquired through private payment.

CONCLUSIONS

Reimbursement levels within the demonstration may have enabled more individuals to purchase some services, but they were not sufficient to increase the average level of use over those in the control group. No consistent differences between demonstration models were found in service use likelihood or average use among users.

摘要

研究问题

医疗保险阿尔茨海默病示范项目及其病例管理和社区服务豁免是否影响了痴呆症患者及其主要照料者对社区长期护理服务的使用?

数据来源

基线和定期照料者访谈。测量指标包括客户和照料者的特征以及自我报告的服务使用情况。

研究设计

该示范项目将自愿申请者随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组病例有资格接受病例管理,并每月获得高达699美元的社区护理福利。由于区域成本和随时间的通胀调整,八个示范社区的实际每月补贴有所不同。分析针对入组后的一年。

数据收集

分析对象为入组后在社区存活六个月或更长时间的病例(n = 5209)。病例接受了基线和半年一次的评估。

主要发现

病例管理和社区服务报销干预对使用家庭护理(包括家务/杂务服务、个人护理服务、陪伴服务)和成人日托的可能性产生了强烈、一致且积极的影响。治疗组客户使用四种基于社区服务中任何一种的可能性至少是对照组客户的两倍。照料者培训和支持小组参与也产生了类似但不太普遍的效果。示范项目的医疗保险豁免提供的报销通常不足以超过通过私人支付获得的对照组服务水平。

结论

示范项目中的报销水平可能使更多人能够购买一些服务,但不足以提高使用水平超过对照组。在服务使用可能性或使用者的平均使用量方面,未发现示范模式之间存在一致差异。