Petersson U, Appelros S, Borgström A
Department of Surgery, University Hospital MAS, Malmö, Sweden.
Int J Pancreatol. 1999 Jun;25(3):165-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02925965.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) results in elevated concentrations of trypsinogen (T) isoenzymes in serum. Immunoreactive anionic trypsinogen in urin (irAT/u) is elevated in AP, and has recently been proposed as a rapid diagnostic instrument and severity predictor. These results have not been confirmed by other groups, and irAT/u has not been further characterized. The concentration of immunoreactive cationic trypsinogen in urine (irCT/u) and the serum irAT/irCT ratio in AP have not been extensively examined.
Levels of irAT and irCT were studied in urine and serum from 50 AP patients and in urine from 41 non-AP patients. Severity was assessed according to the Atlanta classification. irAT/u was characterized by gel filtration.
Gel filtration revealed only AT in the urine. Highly significant differences in irAT/u were seen between AP/non-AP (p < 0.0001) and mild/severe disease (p = 0.0012). The irAT/irCT ratio in serum changed from normal 0.8 to 1.3 in AP.
IrAT and only traces of irCT were found in the urine in AP. IrAT/u was higher in AP than in other acute abdominal disorders (non-AP) and also higher in severe than in mild AP. IrAT in serum (irAT/s) increased proportionally more than irCT/s in AP, but did not discriminate mild from severe forms. High levels of irAT/u in some non-AP cases and a wide range in AP cases make the clinical value of the test questionable.
急性胰腺炎(AP)导致血清中胰蛋白酶原(T)同工酶浓度升高。尿中免疫反应性阴离子胰蛋白酶原(irAT/u)在AP中升高,最近被提议作为一种快速诊断工具和严重程度预测指标。这些结果尚未得到其他研究小组的证实,并且irAT/u尚未得到进一步的特征描述。AP患者尿中免疫反应性阳离子胰蛋白酶原(irCT/u)的浓度以及血清irAT/irCT比值尚未得到广泛研究。
对50例AP患者的尿液和血清以及41例非AP患者的尿液中的irAT和irCT水平进行了研究。根据亚特兰大分类法评估严重程度。通过凝胶过滤对irAT/u进行特征描述。
凝胶过滤显示尿液中仅存在AT。AP/非AP组(p < 0.0001)和轻度/重度疾病组(p = 0.0012)之间的irAT/u存在高度显著差异。AP患者血清中的irAT/irCT比值从正常的0.8变为1.3。
在AP患者的尿液中发现了irAT,仅检测到微量的irCT。AP患者的irAT/u高于其他急性腹部疾病(非AP),并且重度AP患者高于轻度AP患者。AP患者血清中的irAT(irAT/s)比irCT/s升高得更多,但无法区分轻度和重度AP。一些非AP病例中irAT/u水平较高,而AP病例中该指标范围较宽,这使得该检测的临床价值受到质疑。