Bradley J, Dempster M, Wallace E, Elborn S
University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Northern Ireland, UK.
Qual Life Res. 1999;8(1-2):65-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1026437214170.
The assessment of quality of life (QoL) is necessary to monitor the course of disease and to assess the effect of new and existing interventions in clinical practice. This will only be achieved if QoL can be measured accurately and routinely. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the methodology involved in the adaptation and shortening of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ) in a population of adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). A single interviewer administered the CRDQ to a sample of 45 adult patients (32 males) with CF prior to assessment of spirometric measures of lung function. Those patients whose lung function was stable at the time of study and who could attend for a retest within 14 days were asked to complete the questionnaire at a subsequent visit (n = 10). The mean interval between visits was 7 days (range 5-14 days). Correlations between spirometry and CRDQ dimensions ranged from -0.003 to 0.426. The fatigue, emotion and mastery dimensions showed high internal consistency and adequate construct validity. In the small number of patients suitable for retest, the results indicated that the dimensions exhibited adequate test-retest reliability. In contrast, low internal consistency was demonstrated for the dyspnoea dimension. The fatigue, emotion and mastery dimensions could be reduced, in terms of their number of items, without a substantial loss in explanatory power. This study suggests that QoL measurement can be made convenient and, thus, more easily accessible for routine clinical assessment.
在临床实践中,评估生活质量(QoL)对于监测疾病进程以及评估新的和现有的干预措施的效果是必要的。只有当QoL能够被准确且常规地测量时,这一目标才能实现。本研究的目的是展示在成年囊性纤维化(CF)患者群体中对慢性呼吸道疾病问卷(CRDQ)进行改编和缩短所涉及的方法。在评估肺功能的肺活量测定指标之前,由一名访谈者向45名成年CF患者(32名男性)的样本发放CRDQ。那些在研究时肺功能稳定且能够在14天内前来重新测试的患者被要求在后续就诊时完成问卷(n = 10)。就诊之间的平均间隔为7天(范围5 - 14天)。肺活量测定与CRDQ各维度之间的相关性范围为 -0.003至0.426。疲劳、情绪和掌控维度显示出高内部一致性和充分的结构效度。在少数适合重新测试的患者中,结果表明这些维度表现出充分的重测信度。相比之下,呼吸困难维度显示出低内部一致性。就项目数量而言,疲劳、情绪和掌控维度可以减少,而不会在解释力上有实质性损失。本研究表明,可以使QoL测量变得方便,从而更易于用于常规临床评估。