Suppr超能文献

公众生命支持急救培训——综述与建议

Life supporting first aid training of the public--review and recommendations.

作者信息

Eisenburger P, Safar P

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 1999 Jun;41(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00034-9.

Abstract

Since the introduction around 1960 of external cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) basic life support (BLS) without equipment, i.e. steps A (airway control)-B (mouth-to-mouth breathing)-C (chest (cardiac) compressions), training courses by instructors have been provided, first to medical personnel and later to some but not all lay persons. At present, fewer than 30% of out-of-hospital resuscitation attempts are initiated by lay bystanders. The numbers of lives saved have remained suboptimal, in part because of a weak or absent first link in the life support chain. This review concerns education research aimed at helping more lay persons to acquire high life supporting first aid (LSFA) skill levels and to use these skills. In the 1960s, Safar and Laerdal studied and promoted self-training in LSFA, which includes: call for the ambulance (without abandoning the patient) (now also call for an automatic external defibrillator); CPR-BLS steps A-B-C; external hemorrhage control; and positioning for shock and unconsciousness (coma). LSFA steps are psychomotor skills. Organizations like the American Red Cross and the American Heart Association have produced instructor-courses of many more first aid skills, or for cardiac arrest only-not of LSFA skills needed by all suddenly comatose victims. Self-training methods might help all people acquire LSFA skills. Implementation is still lacking. Variable proportions of lay trainees evaluated, ranging from school children to elderly persons, were found capable of performing LSFA skills on manikins. Audio-tape or video-tape coached self-practice on manikins was more effective than instructor-courses. Mere viewing of demonstrations (e.g. televised films) without practice has enabled more persons to perform some skills effectively compared to untrained control groups. The quality of LSFA performance in the field and its impact on outcome of patients remain to be evaluated. Psychological factors have been associated with skill acquisition and retention, and motivational factors with application. Manikin practice proved necessary for best skill acquisition of steps B and C. Simplicity and repetition proved important. Repetitive television spots and brief internet movies for motivating and demonstrating would reach all people. LSFA should be part of basic health education. LSFA self-learning laboratories should be set up and maintained in schools and drivers' license stations. The trauma-focused steps of LSFA are important for 'buddy help' in military combat casualty care, and natural mass disasters.

摘要

自1960年左右引入无需设备的体外心肺复苏术(CPR)基础生命支持(BLS),即A(气道控制)-B(口对口呼吸)-C(胸部(心脏)按压)步骤以来,培训课程首先面向医务人员,后来也面向部分而非全部的普通民众,由教员授课。目前,院外复苏尝试中由普通旁观者发起的比例不到30%。挽救的生命数量一直未达最佳,部分原因是生命支持链中的第一个环节薄弱或缺失。本综述涉及教育研究,旨在帮助更多普通民众获得高水平的生命支持急救(LSFA)技能并运用这些技能。20世纪60年代,萨法尔和拉德尔研究并推广了LSFA的自我训练,包括:呼叫救护车(不放弃患者)(现在也呼叫自动体外除颤器);CPR-BLS的A-B-C步骤;外部出血控制;以及休克和昏迷时的体位摆放。LSFA步骤属于心理运动技能。美国红十字会和美国心脏协会等组织开设了更多急救技能的教员课程,或者仅针对心脏骤停的课程,而非所有突然昏迷受害者所需的LSFA技能课程。自我训练方法可能有助于所有人掌握LSFA技能。目前仍缺乏相关实施。对不同比例的普通受训者进行评估,从学童到老年人,发现他们有能力在人体模型上进行LSFA技能操作。在人体模型上进行录音带或录像带指导的自我练习比教员授课更有效。与未受过训练的对照组相比,仅仅观看演示(如电视电影)而不进行练习,就能使更多人有效地执行一些技能。在现场的LSFA操作质量及其对患者预后的影响仍有待评估。心理因素与技能的获得和保持有关,动机因素与技能的应用有关。事实证明,对步骤B和C进行最佳技能训练,人体模型练习是必要的。简单性和重复性很重要。重复性的电视广告和简短的网络电影用于激励和演示,将能覆盖所有人。LSFA应成为基础健康教育的一部分。应在学校和驾照考试站点设立并维护LSFA自学实验室。LSFA中针对创伤的步骤对于军事战斗伤员护理和自然灾害中的“同伴互助”很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验