Fontana L, Armas R, Garway-Heath D F, Bunce C V, Poinoosawmy D, Hitchings R A
Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Sep;83(9):1002-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.9.1002.
To investigate the influence of several clinical variables on the development of visual field loss in the "second eye" of patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) presenting with unilateral field loss.
Patients with NTG and unilateral field loss at presentation were selected from a cohort of 403 consecutive diagnoses of NTG. The state of the visual field "normal" or with a visual field defect was defined using the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) template. Where available, optic disc planimetry was carried out on stereo photographs taken at presentation. Measurements of the topography of each of these optic discs were compared with morphometric values from a group of normal subjects, allowing for differences in age and disc size. For each patient the percentage of the relative neuroretinal rim (NRR) area was calculated. The time taken to develop a visual field defect was related to clinical factors including age, sex, peak and mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP), refraction, relative NRR area, and the AGIS score of the fellow eye at presentation
54 patients were included in the study. The median (range) follow up time was 49.2 (11.1-116.7) months. 14 (26%) patients developed field loss in the eyes with an initially normal field. The estimate of the median time to field loss onset was 95.1 months. Field damage developed more rapidly in women and in patients with greater AGIS score in the contralateral eye at the beginning of follow up ((adjusted hazard ratio, HR (95% confidence interval, CI) 0.20 (0. 04; 0.93); 1.19 (1.02; 1.41) respectively)). Little evidence of any association was found between time to onset of field loss and each of age, refraction, and peak or mean diurnal IOP. Planimetric disc analysis was carried out in 33 (61%) patients. Of these 10 (30%) developed field loss in the eyes with initial normal field at a median follow up of 95.1 months. After adjustment for sex and AGIS, relative NRR area was found to be significantly related to the time of onset of field damage, the greater the reduction in relative NRR area, the shorter the time to visual field loss (HR 0.93 (0.89; 0. 99)).
NTG patients with unilateral field loss are at high risk of developing field damage in the eyes with an initially normal visual field. In this study, the visual prognosis of the eye with the normal visual field at presentation was found to be influenced by the extent of the reduction in relative NRR area together with the severity of field damage in the contralateral eye at presentation.
探讨几个临床变量对单侧视野缺损的正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者“对侧眼”视野丧失发展的影响。
从连续诊断的403例NTG患者队列中选取初诊时单侧视野缺损的NTG患者。使用高级青光眼干预研究(AGIS)模板定义视野“正常”或存在视野缺损的状态。在可行的情况下,对初诊时拍摄的立体照片进行视盘平面测量。将这些视盘的每一个地形测量值与一组正常受试者的形态测量值进行比较,同时考虑年龄和视盘大小的差异。计算每位患者相对神经视网膜 rim(NRR)面积的百分比。视野缺损发展所需时间与临床因素相关,包括年龄、性别、昼夜眼压峰值和平均值(IOP)、屈光不正、相对NRR面积以及初诊时对侧眼的AGIS评分。
54例患者纳入研究。中位(范围)随访时间为49.2(11.1 - 116.7)个月。14例(26%)患者最初视野正常的眼睛出现了视野丧失。视野丧失开始的中位时间估计为95.1个月。随访开始时,女性以及对侧眼AGIS评分较高的患者视野损害发展更快(调整后的风险比,HR(95%置信区间,CI)分别为0.20(0.04;0.93);1.19(1.02;1.41))。未发现视野丧失开始时间与年龄、屈光不正、昼夜眼压峰值或平均值之间存在明显关联。33例(61%)患者进行了视盘平面分析。其中10例(30%)在中位随访95.1个月时最初视野正常的眼睛出现了视野丧失。在调整性别和AGIS后,发现相对NRR面积与视野损害开始时间显著相关,相对NRR面积减少越多,视野丧失时间越短(HR 0.93(0.89;0.99))。
单侧视野缺损的NTG患者最初视野正常的眼睛发生视野损害的风险很高。在本研究中,发现初诊时视野正常的眼睛的视觉预后受相对NRR面积减少程度以及初诊时对侧眼视野损害严重程度的影响。