Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Wu J X, Bunce C V, Hitchings R A
Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, England.
Ophthalmology. 1998 Jun;105(6):988-91. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96049-3.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the frequency of asymmetric visual field loss at presentation in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and high-tension glaucoma (HTG).
A retrospective cross-sectional study design was used.
Four hundred and three NTG patients and 337 consecutive HTG patients (consecutive diagnoses between 1986 and 1996).
Analysis of the frequency of unilateral field loss presentations in NTG and HTG. The visual fields of fellow eyes were compared to determine the side of more severe field loss. For the NTG patients, the relationship between the side with greater field loss and corresponding intraocular pressure (IOP) was investigated.
Humphrey field analyzer mean defect (MD) and mean diurnal IOP.
In the NTG group, 101 (25%) patients presented with unilateral field loss. The proportion of cases with unilateral field loss decreased with increasing age of presentation (chi-square test for trend = 26.9; P < 0.0001). Sixty-four percent of the patients had unilateral field loss in the left eye. Sixty-eight percent of the cases with bilateral field loss had a higher MD in the left eye. The diurnal IOP was estimated as 0.23 +/- 0.068 mmHg (mean +/- SE) higher in the left eye (P = 0.001). In the HTG group, 104 (31%) patients presented with unilateral field loss. The proportion of cases with unilateral field loss decreased with increasing age of presentation (chi-square test for trend = 4.6; P = 0.03). Right and left eyes had an equal chance of having field loss in unilateral cases and of being the side of more advanced field damage in bilateral cases.
The frequency of cases with unilateral field loss was similar in HTG and NTG patients. Patients with unilateral field loss at presentation were more likely to be at the younger end of the age range. In the NTG population we studied, the left eye was more frequently the side of onset of field loss and 2.1 times more likely to present with a greater field defect than the right eye. In HTG patients, right and left eyes showed an equal chance of being the side of onset of field damage and the more affected side.
本研究旨在评估正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)和高眼压性青光眼(HTG)患者就诊时不对称视野缺损的发生率。
采用回顾性横断面研究设计。
403例NTG患者和337例连续的HTG患者(1986年至1996年间连续诊断)。
分析NTG和HTG患者单侧视野缺损表现的发生率。比较对侧眼的视野以确定视野缺损更严重的一侧。对于NTG患者,研究视野缺损更严重一侧与相应眼压(IOP)之间的关系。
Humphrey视野分析仪平均缺损(MD)和平均日眼压。
在NTG组中,101例(25%)患者表现为单侧视野缺损。单侧视野缺损病例的比例随就诊年龄的增加而降低(趋势卡方检验=26.9;P<0.0001)。64%的患者左眼出现单侧视野缺损。68%的双侧视野缺损病例左眼的MD更高。左眼的日眼压估计比右眼高0.23±0.068 mmHg(平均值±标准误)(P=0.001)。在HTG组中,104例(31%)患者表现为单侧视野缺损。单侧视野缺损病例的比例随就诊年龄的增加而降低(趋势卡方检验=4.6;P=0.03)。在单侧病例中,右眼和左眼出现视野缺损的机会均等,在双侧病例中,右眼和左眼成为视野损害更严重一侧的机会也均等。
HTG和NTG患者单侧视野缺损病例的发生率相似。就诊时出现单侧视野缺损的患者更可能处于年龄范围的较低端。在我们研究的NTG人群中,左眼更常是视野缺损的起始侧,出现更大视野缺损的可能性是右眼的2.1倍。在HTG患者中,右眼和左眼成为视野损害起始侧和受影响更严重一侧的机会均等。