• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝内结石:经皮治疗方法

Intrahepatic stones: the percutaneous approach.

作者信息

Neuhaus H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul-Aug;13(6):467-72. doi: 10.1155/1999/847954.

DOI:10.1155/1999/847954
PMID:10464345
Abstract

Intrahepatic stones are prevalent in the Far East, whereas they are infrequently seen in Western countries. Hepatolithiasis can cause recurrent attacks of cholangitis, with a risk of liver abscesses, sepsis or hepatic failure. Immediate biliary decompression can usually be achieved by endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic drainage. Definitive treatment should aim for complete elimination of bile stasis and removal of all stones. Hepatic resection promises the best long term results when the disease is limited to segments or the left liver lobe. Endoscopic retrograde choledochopancreatography is not well established for intrahepatic stones because of frequent failures due to associated biliary strictures, angulated ducts or peripherally impacted concrements. In contrast, percutaneous procedures can be easily performed through a T tube tract for residual stones after surgery. Establishment of a transhepatic fistula allows a targeted approach to liver segments with catheters or miniscopes, without the need for laparotomy. Biliary strictures can be dilated with balloons, and intrahepatic stones can be removed with baskets under fluoroscopic or cholangioscopic control. These techniques can be combined with electrohydraulic lithotripsy or laser lithotripsy for disintegration of impacted calculi. The risk of stone recurrence is particularly high in patients with associated biliary stenoses. Temporary or long term transhepatic intubation is a promising approach in these cases. The optimal management of intrahepatic stones remains a challenging task that requires an experienced team of gastroenterologists, surgeons and radiologists.

摘要

肝内结石在远东地区很常见,而在西方国家则很少见。肝内胆管结石可导致胆管炎反复发作,有发生肝脓肿、败血症或肝衰竭的风险。通常可通过内镜或经皮肝穿刺引流实现即时胆道减压。确定性治疗应旨在完全消除胆汁淤积并清除所有结石。当疾病局限于肝段或左肝叶时,肝切除术有望取得最佳的长期效果。由于肝内结石常伴有胆管狭窄、胆管成角或结石位于周边等情况导致内镜逆行胰胆管造影术成功率低,因此该方法对肝内结石的治疗效果不佳。相比之下,经皮操作可通过手术后的T管窦道轻松完成,用于清除残留结石。建立经肝瘘可通过导管或微型内镜对肝段进行有针对性的治疗,而无需开腹手术。胆管狭窄可用球囊扩张,肝内结石可在荧光透视或胆管镜控制下用网篮取出。这些技术可与液电碎石术或激光碎石术联合使用,以粉碎嵌顿结石。伴有胆管狭窄的患者结石复发风险特别高。在这些情况下,临时或长期经肝插管是一种很有前景的方法。肝内结石的最佳管理仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务,需要由经验丰富的胃肠病学家、外科医生和放射科医生组成的团队来完成。

相似文献

1
Intrahepatic stones: the percutaneous approach.肝内结石:经皮治疗方法
Can J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul-Aug;13(6):467-72. doi: 10.1155/1999/847954.
2
Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy.经皮经肝胆道镜碎石术
Br J Surg. 1990 May;77(5):530-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770519.
3
Choledochoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy and lithotomy for stones in the common bile duct, intrahepatic ducts, and gallbladder.经胆道镜电液压碎石及取石术治疗胆总管、肝内胆管和胆囊结石。
Ann Surg. 1989 Nov;210(5):576-82. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198911000-00002.
4
Pulsed dye laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones.胆管结石的脉冲染料激光碎石术。
Gastroenterology. 1991 Jun;100(6):1730-6. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90676-c.
5
Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones under direct visual control.直视控制下难取性胆管结石的激光碎石术
Gut. 1993 Mar;34(3):415-21. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.415.
6
Intrahepatic stones. The transhepatic team approach.肝内结石。经肝团队治疗方法。
Ann Surg. 1994 May;219(5):527-35; discussion 535-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199405000-00011.
7
[Percutaneous treatment of intrahepatic lithiasis].[经皮肝内结石治疗]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2001 Jun-Jul;25(6-7):581-8.
8
Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy and change of biliary manometry patterns.经皮经肝胆道镜碎石术及胆道测压模式的改变
Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Jul-Aug;46(28):2153-8.
9
Percutaneous removal of retained intrahepatic stones with a pre-shaped angulated catheter: review of 96 patients.使用预塑形成角导管经皮清除肝内残留结石:96例患者的回顾
Br J Radiol. 1992 Jan;65(769):9-13. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-769-9.
10
Are modified procedures significantly better than conventional procedures in percutaneous transhepatic treatment for complicated right hepatolithiasis with intrahepatic biliary strictures?在经皮肝穿刺治疗复杂右肝内胆管结石伴肝内胆管狭窄方面,改良手术是否明显优于传统手术?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 May;37(5):597-601. doi: 10.1080/00365520252903161.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic one-step biliary fistulation combined with rigid choledochoscopy for recurrent hepatolithiasis.超声引导经皮经肝一步法胆道造瘘联合硬性胆道镜治疗复发性肝内胆管结石。
BMC Surg. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02370-x.
2
Percutaneous Management of Biliary Stones.经皮胆管结石治疗
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021 Aug;38(3):348-355. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731373. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Predictive factors affecting percutaneous drainage duration in the percutaneous treatment of common bile duct stones.
影响经皮胆管结石经皮治疗引流时间的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0248003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248003. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison Between Percutaneous Transhepatic Rigid Cholangioscopic Lithotripsy and Conventional Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangioscopic Surgery for Hepatolithiasis Treatment.经皮经肝胆道硬镜碎石术与传统经皮经肝胆道镜手术治疗肝内胆管结石的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Feb;26(1):54-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000222.
5
Operative choledochoscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted intrahepatic gallstones: a novel surgical approach.手术中经胆道镜激光碎石治疗肝内胆管嵌顿结石:一种新型手术方法。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):221-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9953-5. Epub 2008 May 10.
6
The treatment of intrahepatic calculosis by applying helix hydro-jet lithotripsy under video choledochoscope: a report of 30 cases.经胆道镜直视下螺旋水刀治疗肝内胆管结石30例报告
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;391(4):355-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0058-0. Epub 2006 May 20.
7
Choledochal Cystic Diseases.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2001 Apr;4(2):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s11938-001-0023-5.