Sarrazin Mary S Vaughan, Campbell Mary E, Richardson Kelly K, Rosenthal Gary E
Center for Research in Innovative Implementation Strategies for Practice (CRIISP), Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa 52246, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1424-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00977.x. Epub 2009 May 7.
This study examines two dimensions of racial segregation across hospitals, using a disease for which substantial disparities have been documented.
Black (n=32,289) and white (n=244,042) patients 67 years and older admitted for acute myocardial infarction during 2004-2005 in 105 hospital markets were identified from Medicare data. Two measures of segregation were calculated: Dissimilarity (i.e., dissimilar distribution by race across hospitals), and Isolation (i.e., racial isolation within hospitals). For each measure, markets were categorized as having low, medium, or high segregation.
The relationship of hospital segregation to residential segregation and other market characteristics was evaluated. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate disparities in the use of revascularization within 90 days by segregation level.
Agreement of segregation category based on Dissimilarity and Isolation was poor (kappa=0.12), and the relationship of disparities in revascularization to segregation differed by measure. The hazard of revascularization for black relative to white patients was lowest (i.e., greatest disparity) in markets with low Dissimilarity, but it was unrelated to Isolation.
Significant racial segregation across hospitals exists in many U.S. markets, although the magnitude and relationship to disparities depends on definition. Dissimilar distribution of race across hospitals may reflect divergent cultural preferences, social norms, and patient assessments of provider cultural competence, which ultimately impact utilization.
本研究利用一种已记录有显著差异的疾病,考察医院间种族隔离的两个维度。
从医疗保险数据中识别出2004 - 2005年期间在105个医院市场因急性心肌梗死入院的67岁及以上黑人患者(n = 32289)和白人患者(n = 244042)。计算了两种隔离指标:差异度(即不同种族在各医院的分布差异)和隔离度(即医院内部的种族隔离)。对于每个指标,将市场分为低、中、高隔离类别。
评估医院隔离与居住隔离及其他市场特征之间的关系。采用Cox比例风险回归来评估按隔离水平划分的90天内血管重建术使用情况的差异。
基于差异度和隔离度的隔离类别一致性较差(kappa = 0.12),血管重建术差异与隔离的关系因指标而异。在差异度低的市场中,黑人患者相对于白人患者进行血管重建术的风险最低(即差异最大),但与隔离度无关。
在美国许多市场中,医院间存在显著的种族隔离,尽管其程度和与差异的关系取决于定义。不同种族在各医院的分布差异可能反映了不同的文化偏好、社会规范以及患者对医疗服务提供者文化能力的评估,这些最终会影响医疗服务的利用情况。