Wilkinson E K, Salisbury C, Bosanquet N, Franks P J, Kite S, Lorentzon M, Naysmith A
Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton, UK.
Palliat Med. 1999 May;13(3):197-216. doi: 10.1191/026921699673563105.
This systematic literature review examined the impact of specialist models of palliative care on consumer satisfaction, opinion and preference over the past 20 years. From the literature search, 83 relevant papers were identified. Research findings from North America did not reveal any reliable or consistent trends, and this was due primarily to methodological flaws in the research. In the UK, consumers are more satisfied with all types of palliative care, whether provided by inpatient units or in the community, than with palliative care provided by general hospitals. Even though research findings consistently indicate that consumers appreciate the psychosocial climate in hospices, this research was based on small-scale local studies which were mainly focused on a single hospice. The dearth of high quality, comprehensive research was notable on the impact on consumer preference, opinion or satisfaction of hospice home care services, and other forms of palliative care in the community. It was concluded that further research is needed into consumer priorities for patients dying of noncancer diseases, and into the possible impact of patient characteristics on consumer satisfaction, opinion and preference for specialist models of palliative care.
本系统文献综述考察了过去20年姑息治疗专科模式对消费者满意度、意见和偏好的影响。通过文献检索,共识别出83篇相关论文。北美地区的研究结果未显示出任何可靠或一致的趋势,这主要归因于研究中的方法缺陷。在英国,消费者对各类姑息治疗(无论是由住院单元还是社区提供)的满意度高于综合医院提供的姑息治疗。尽管研究结果一致表明消费者欣赏临终关怀机构的心理社会氛围,但该研究基于小规模的本地研究,主要聚焦于单一临终关怀机构。关于临终关怀居家护理服务以及社区中其他形式的姑息治疗对消费者偏好、意见或满意度的影响,高质量、全面的研究明显匮乏。研究得出结论,需要进一步研究非癌症疾病临终患者的消费者优先事项,以及患者特征对消费者对姑息治疗专科模式的满意度、意见和偏好可能产生的影响。