Suppr超能文献

低顺应性肺婴儿的压力限制通气:使用体外模型比较成人环路系统与两种独立重症监护病房通气系统的效果

Pressure-limited ventilation of infants with low-compliance lungs: the efficacy of an adult circle system versus two free-standing intensive care unit ventilator systems using an in vitro model.

作者信息

Stevenson G W, Horn B, Tobin M, Chen E H, Sautel M, Hall S C, Coté C J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):638-41. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199909000-00017.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We compared the efficacy of a Drager Narkomed GS (North American Drager, Telford, PA) equipped with an adult circle system with two free-standing infant ventilator systems (Servo 300; Siemens Medical Systems, Danvers, MA and Babylog 8000; North American Drager) to deliver minute ventilation (VE) using pressure-limited ventilation to a test lung set to low compliance. To simulate a wide variety of potential patterns of ventilation, VE was measured at peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) of 20, 30, 40, and 50 cm H2O and at respiratory rates (RR) of 20, 30, 40, and 50 breaths/min. Each measurement was made three times; the average was used for data analysis using the multiple regression technique. Delivered V(E) was positively correlated with both PIP (P = 0.001) and RR (P = 0.001). Only minimal differences in VE were observed between the circle and the two free-standing systems. At lower RR and PIP, the Babylog 8000 system delivered slightly higher VE than the circle system, whereas at higher RR and PIP, the Babylog 8000 delivered slightly lower VE than the circle system; these differences in VE were not statistically significant (P = 0.45). The Servo 300 delivered slightly higher VE than the circle system in all test conditions, but these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.09). None of the differences in delivered VE between the Servo 300 and the circle system are of clinical importance.

IMPLICATIONS

Our laboratory investigation suggests that pressure-limited ventilation delivered by a standard adult circle system compares favorably with that of freestanding infant ventilators used in pressure-limited mode. Changing from an adult circle system to a free-standing pressure-limited ventilator may not substantially improve ventilation of a low-compliance infant lung; the efficacy of such a practice should be investigated.

摘要

未标注

我们将配备成人环路系统的德尔格Narkomed GS(北美德尔格公司,宾夕法尼亚州特尔福德)与两个独立的婴儿呼吸机系统(Servo 300;西门子医疗系统公司,马萨诸塞州丹弗斯;以及Babylog 8000;北美德尔格公司)的效能进行了比较,采用压力限制通气向设置为低顺应性的测试肺输送分钟通气量(VE)。为模拟多种潜在的通气模式,在吸气峰压(PIP)为20、30、40和50 cm H₂O以及呼吸频率(RR)为20、30、40和50次/分钟时测量VE。每次测量进行三次;采用多元回归技术将平均值用于数据分析。输送的V(E)与PIP(P = 0.001)和RR(P = 0.001)均呈正相关。在环路系统与两个独立系统之间仅观察到VE的极小差异。在较低的RR和PIP时,Babylog 8000系统输送的VE略高于环路系统,而在较高的RR和PIP时,Babylog 8000输送的VE略低于环路系统;这些VE差异无统计学意义(P = 0.45)。在所有测试条件下,Servo 300输送的VE略高于环路系统,但这些差异无统计学意义(P = 0.09)。Servo 300与环路系统之间输送的VE差异均无临床重要性。

启示

我们的实验室研究表明,标准成人环路系统进行的压力限制通气与压力限制模式下使用的独立婴儿呼吸机相比具有优势。从成人环路系统更换为独立的压力限制呼吸机可能不会显著改善低顺应性婴儿肺的通气;应研究这种做法的效能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验