Ziegler D, Hanefeld M, Ruhnau K J, Hasche H, Lobisch M, Schütte K, Kerum G, Malessa R
Diabetes-Forschungsinstitut an der Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 1999 Aug;22(8):1296-301. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1296.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alpha-lipoic acid given intravenously, followed by oral treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with symptomatic polyneuropathy.
In a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Diabetic Neuropathy [ALADIN] III Study), 509 outpatients were randomly assigned to sequential treatment with 600 mg alpha-lipoic acid once daily intravenously for 3 weeks, followed by 600 mg alpha-lipoic acid three times a day orally for 6 months (A-A; n = 167); 600 mg alpha-lipoic acid once daily intravenously for 3 weeks, followed by placebo three times a day orally for 6 months (A-P; n = 174); and placebo once daily intravenously for 3 weeks, followed by placebo three times a day orally for 6 months (P-P; n = 168). Outcome measures included the Total Symptom Score (TSS) for neuropathic symptoms (pain, burning, paresthesias, and numbness) in the feet, and the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS). Data analysis was based on the intention to treat.
No significant differences between the groups were noted for the demographic variables and the nerve function parameters at baseline. The TSS in the feet decreased from baseline to day 19 (median [range]) by -3.7 (-12.6 to 5.0) points in the group given alpha-lipoic acid intravenously and by -3.0 (-12.3 to 8.0) points in the placebo group (P = 0.447), but the area under curve on a daily basis was significantly smaller in the active as compared with the placebo group (85.6 [0-219] vs. 95.9 [5.5-220]); P = 0.033). After 7 months, the changes in the TSS from baseline were not significantly different between the three groups studied, which could be due to increasing intercenter variability in the TSS during the trial. The NIS decreased after 19 days by -4.34+/-0.35 points (mean +/- SEM) in A-A and A-P and -3.49+/-0.58 points in P-P (P = 0.02 for alpha-lipoic acid versus placebo) and after 7 months by -5.82+/-0.73 points in A-A, -5.76+/-0.69 points in A-P, and -4.37+/-0.83 points in P-P (P = 0.09 for A-A vs. P-P). The rates of adverse events were not different between the groups throughout the study.
These findings indicate that a 3-week intravenous treatment with alpha-lipoic acid, followed by a 6-month oral treatment, had no effect on neuropathic symptoms distinguishable from placebo to a clinically meaningful degree, possibly due to increasing intercenter variability in symptom scoring during the study. However, this treatment was associated with a favorable effect on neuropathic deficits without causing significant adverse reactions. Long-term trials that focus on neuropathic deficits rather than symptoms as the primary criterion of efficacy are needed to see whether oral treatment with alpha-lipoic acid over several years may slow or reverse the progression of diabetic neuropathy.
评估静脉注射α-硫辛酸后继以口服治疗对2型糖尿病伴症状性多发性神经病变患者的疗效和安全性。
在一项多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验(糖尿病神经病变中的α-硫辛酸[ALADIN]III研究)中,509例门诊患者被随机分配接受序贯治疗:每日1次静脉注射600mgα-硫辛酸,持续3周,随后每日3次口服600mgα-硫辛酸,持续6个月(A-A组;n = 167);每日1次静脉注射600mgα-硫辛酸,持续3周,随后每日3次口服安慰剂,持续6个月(A-P组;n = 174);以及每日1次静脉注射安慰剂,持续3周,随后每日3次口服安慰剂,持续6个月(P-P组;n = 168)。观察指标包括足部神经病变症状(疼痛、烧灼感、感觉异常和麻木)的总症状评分(TSS)以及神经病变损害评分(NIS)。数据分析基于意向性治疗原则。
各治疗组在人口统计学变量和基线神经功能参数方面无显著差异。静脉注射α-硫辛酸组足部TSS从基线至第19天(中位数[范围])下降了-3.7(-12.6至5.0)分,安慰剂组下降了-3.0(-12.3至8.0)分(P = 0.447),但活性药物组每日曲线下面积与安慰剂组相比显著更小(85.6[0 - 219]对95.9[5.5 - 220];P = 0.033)。7个月后,所研究的三组间TSS相对于基线的变化无显著差异,这可能是由于试验期间TSS的中心间变异性增加所致。NIS在19天后,A-A组和A-P组下降了-4.34±0.35分(均值±标准误),P-P组下降了-3.49±0.5分(α-硫辛酸与安慰剂相比,P = 0.02),7个月后,A-A组下降了-5.82±0.73分,A-P组下降了-5.76±0.69分,P-P组下降了-4.37±0.83分(A-A组与P-P组相比,P = 0.09)。在整个研究过程中,各治疗组不良事件发生率无差异。
这些研究结果表明,3周静脉注射α-硫辛酸后继以6个月口服治疗,对神经病变症状无临床上有意义的、与安慰剂可区分的效果,这可能是由于研究期间症状评分的中心间变异性增加所致。然而,该治疗对神经病变缺损有有益作用,且未引起显著不良反应。需要进行长期试验,以神经病变缺损而非症状作为疗效的主要标准,来观察数年的α-硫辛酸口服治疗是否可能减缓或逆转糖尿病神经病变的进展。