The duty to recontact: benefit and harm.
作者信息
Sharpe N F
出版信息
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Oct;65(4):1201-4. doi: 10.1086/302587.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The duty to recontact: benefit and harm.再次联系的义务：益处与危害。
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Oct;65(4):1201-4. doi: 10.1086/302587.
2
Recontact practices of cancer genetic counselors and an exploration of professional, legal, and ethical duty.癌症遗传咨询师的再次接触实践以及对专业、法律和道德责任的探讨。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Aug;28(4):836-846. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1126. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Duty to re-contact.再次联系的义务。
Genet Med. 1999 May-Jun;1(4):171-2. doi: 10.1097/00125817-199905000-00010.
4
The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers.再次联系的责任：遗传学服务提供者的态度
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Oct;61(4):A57.
5
Duty to re-contact: a study of families at risk for Fragile X.再次联系的责任：一项关于脆性X综合征高危家庭的研究。
J Genet Couns. 1999 Feb;8(1):3-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1022878402764.
6
Ethical issues in Huntington disease presymptomatic testing.亨廷顿病症状前检测中的伦理问题。
Aust N Z J Med. 1990 Aug;20(4):545-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1990.tb01310.x.
7
Staying informed and recontacting patients about research advances: a study of patient attitudes.
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Oct;59(4):A335.
8
9
Recontacting patients for multigene panel testing in hereditary cancer: Efficacy and insights.遗传性癌症多基因检测面板对患者的再次检测：效果与见解
J Genet Couns. 2019 Dec;28(6):1198-1207. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1173. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
10
Experts reflecting on the duty to recontact patients and research participants; why professionals should take the lead in developing guidelines.专家们对再次联系患者和研究参与者的职责进行反思；为何专业人士应带头制定指导方针。
Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Feb;63(2):103642. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.临床遗传学服务中患者的再联系：欧洲人类遗传学会的建议。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb;27(2):169-182. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0285-1. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
2
Physicians' duty to recontact and update genetic advice.医生重新联系并更新基因咨询的职责。
Per Med. 2017;14(4):367-374. doi: 10.2217/pme-2017-0012. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
3
Recontacting in clinical practice: the views and expectations of patients in the United Kingdom.临床实践中的再次联系：英国患者的观点与期望
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Oct;25(10):1106-1112. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.122. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom.临床实践中的再次联系：对英国医疗保健专业人员和临床科学家观点的调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb;25(3):275-279. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.188. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
5
Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom.临床实践中的再次接触：英国临床遗传学服务调查
Genet Med. 2016 Sep;18(9):876-81. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.194. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.鉴于新的基因技术，是否有再次联系的义务？文献系统综述。
Genet Med. 2015 Aug;17(8):668-78. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.173. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
7
The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.基因组学研究结果回传的法律风险。
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):473-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.10. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
8
Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.无症状未成年人的基因检测：欧洲人类遗传学学会（ESHG）建议的背景考量
Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Jun;17(6):711-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.25. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
本文引用的文献
1
Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.已发布的评估健康相关网站的标准：综述。
BMJ. 1999 Mar 6;318(7184):647-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647.
2
The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers.再次联系的义务：遗传学服务提供者的态度
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Mar;64(3):852-60. doi: 10.1086/302293.
3
Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?评估互联网上的健康信息：是通向知识还是走向巴别塔？
JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611.
4
Risk reversals in predictive testing for Huntington disease.亨廷顿病预测性检测中的风险逆转
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Oct;61(4):945-52. doi: 10.1086/514873.
5
6
Informed consent and Huntington disease: a model for communication.知情同意与亨廷顿舞蹈症：一种沟通模式
Am J Med Genet. 1994 Apr 15;50(3):239-46. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320500306.
7
Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: a legal perspective.
Am J Med Genet. 1994 Apr 15;50(3):234-8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320500305.
8
The 'right' not to know.不知情的“权利”。
J Med Philos. 1984 Aug;9(3):301-12. doi: 10.1093/jmp/9.3.301.
9
The role of beneficence in clinical genetics: non-directive counseling reconsidered.临床遗传学中善行的作用：对非指导性咨询的重新思考。
Theor Med. 1989 Jun;10(2):139-49. doi: 10.1007/BF00539879.
10
Predictive testing for Huntington disease and the right not to know. Some ethical reflections.亨廷顿舞蹈症的预测性检测与不知情权：一些伦理思考
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1992;28(1):133-8.
Zotero 插件