Cleaveland S, Barrat J, Barrat M J, Selve M, Kaare M, Esterhuysen J
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Epidemiol Infect. 1999 Aug;123(1):157-64. doi: 10.1017/s0950268899002563.
During a serosurvey of domestic dogs in Tanzania, a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) and a liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) were used to measure rabies antibodies in vaccinated and unvaccinated dogs. Post-vaccination titres measured by LPBE correlated closely with those found by RFFIT. Of 567 unvaccinated dogs tested using the LPBE, 42 (7.4%) were seropositive, with titres exceeding 32. Of this group, 233 dogs were tested using the RFFIT and 115 (49.4%) were seropositive, with titres exceeding 0.5 IU/ml. Two lines of evidence pointed to the greater specificity of the LPBE when measuring rabies antibodies induced by natural infections: (a) no seropositive dogs were detected among the 162 unvaccinated dogs from the rabies-free island of Pemba, Tanzania, when using LPBE, whereas 15/145 (10.3%) dogs of the same group were seropositive using RFFIT; (b) among Tanzanian dogs there was a close association between the location of rabies cases and location of seropositive dogs when using LPBE, but not when using RFFIT. These results suggest that LPBE may be of value in rabies seroepidemiological studies and could be developed as a reference technique for the detection of rabies antibody in domestic dogs.
在坦桑尼亚对家犬进行血清学调查期间,采用快速荧光灶抑制试验(RFFIT)和液相阻断ELISA(LPBE)检测接种疫苗和未接种疫苗犬的狂犬病抗体。LPBE测定的疫苗接种后滴度与RFFIT测定的结果密切相关。使用LPBE检测的567只未接种疫苗的犬中,42只(7.4%)血清阳性,滴度超过32。在该组中,233只犬使用RFFIT进行检测,115只(49.4%)血清阳性,滴度超过0.5 IU/ml。有两条证据表明,在检测自然感染诱导的狂犬病抗体时,LPBE具有更高的特异性:(a)在使用LPBE时,坦桑尼亚无狂犬病的奔巴岛的162只未接种疫苗的犬中未检测到血清阳性犬,而使用RFFIT时,同一组中的15/145只(10.3%)犬血清阳性;(b)在坦桑尼亚犬中,使用LPBE时狂犬病病例的位置与血清阳性犬的位置密切相关,但使用RFFIT时则不然。这些结果表明,LPBE在狂犬病血清流行病学研究中可能具有价值,并且可以开发成为检测家犬狂犬病抗体的参考技术。