Suppr超能文献

奥美拉唑试验在非心源性胸痛患者中的成本效益。

The cost-effectiveness of the omeprazole test in patients with noncardiac chest pain.

作者信息

Ofman J J, Gralnek I M, Udani J, Fennerty M B, Fass R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1999 Sep;107(3):219-27. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00219-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Recent evidence suggests that an empiric trial of omeprazole (the "omeprazole test") is sensitive and specific for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as the cause of noncardiac chest pain. Our objective was to examine the clinical, economic, and policy implications of alternative diagnostic strategies for patients with noncardiac chest pain.

METHODS

Decision analysis was used to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of two diagnostic strategies that begin with the omeprazole test (60 mg daily for 7 days) followed sequentially by invasive testing utilizing endoscopy, ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry as necessary, compared with two traditional strategies involving sequential invasive diagnostic tests. Cost estimates were based on Medicare reimbursement and the Red Book of average wholesale drug prices. Probability estimates were derived from a systematic review of the medical literature.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient for the four diagnostic strategies varied from $1,859 to $2,313. Strategies utilizing the initial omeprazole test resulted in 84% of patients being symptom free at 1 year, compared with 73% to 74% for the strategies that began with invasive tests. The strategy of the omeprazole test, followed if necessary by ambulatory pH monitoring, then manometry, and then endoscopy, was both most effective and least expensive. It led to an 11% improvement in diagnostic accuracy and a 43% reduction in the use of invasive diagnostic tests, thus yielding an average cost savings of $454 per patient, compared with the strategy of beginning with endoscopy, then pH monitoring, and then manometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with noncardiac chest pain, diagnostic strategies that begin with the omeprazole test result in reduced costs, improved diagnostic certainty, and a greater proportion of symptom-free patients at 1 year than do traditional strategies that begin with invasive diagnostic tests.

摘要

目的

近期证据表明,奥美拉唑经验性试验(“奥美拉唑试验”)对于诊断胃食管反流病(GERD)作为非心源性胸痛的病因具有敏感性和特异性。我们的目标是研究非心源性胸痛患者采用替代诊断策略的临床、经济和政策影响。

方法

采用决策分析来评估两种诊断策略的临床和经济结果。一种策略是以奥美拉唑试验(每日60毫克,共7天)开始,必要时依次进行内镜检查、动态24小时食管pH监测和食管测压等侵入性检查;另一种策略是两种传统策略,即依次进行侵入性诊断检查。成本估计基于医疗保险报销和《平均批发药品价格红皮书》。概率估计来自对医学文献的系统综述。

结果

四种诊断策略的每位患者平均成本在1859美元至2313美元之间。采用初始奥美拉唑试验的策略使84%的患者在1年内无症状,而从侵入性检查开始的策略这一比例为73%至74%。先进行奥美拉唑试验,必要时再进行动态pH监测,然后测压,最后内镜检查的策略既最有效又最便宜。与从内镜检查开始,然后进行pH监测,再进行测压的策略相比,其诊断准确性提高了11%,侵入性诊断检查的使用减少了43%,每位患者平均节省成本454美元。

结论

在非心源性胸痛患者中,与从侵入性诊断检查开始的传统策略相比,以奥美拉唑试验开始的诊断策略可降低成本,提高诊断确定性,并使1年内无症状患者的比例更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验