Suppr超能文献

短期使用奥美拉唑:对于非心源性胸痛,是比内镜检查、测压法或24小时食管pH监测更好的初始诊断方法。

Short course of omeprazole: a better first diagnostic approach to noncardiac chest pain than endoscopy, manometry, or 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

作者信息

Pandak William M, Arezo Shahwali, Everett Sharon, Jesse Robert, DeCosta Gail, Crofts Theresa, Gennings Chris, Siuta Michael, Zfass Alvin

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonweath University, Richmond, Virginia 23249, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 Oct;35(4):307-14. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200210000-00006.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) presents as a frequent diagnostic challenge, with patients tending to use a disproportionate level of health care resources. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent cause of NCCP.

GOALS

To test the efficacy of a potent acid-suppressing agent as a diagnostic test in the evaluation of NCCP and to compare it with three commonly used tests.

STUDY

Eighteen men and 24 women, aged 22 to 77 years, who presented with recurrent chest pain complaints of a noncardiac etiology, as determined by rest/stress perfusion imaging with technetium Tc99m sestamibi (MIBI), were enrolled in a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial using high-dose omeprazole. Thirty-seven patients completed both arms of the trial. Findings were compared with those of endoscopy, manometry, and ambulatory 24-hour two-channel esophageal pH monitoring. All patients underwent initial diagnostic upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring. Patients were then randomly assigned to either placebo or omeprazole (40 mg/d orally twice daily) for 14 days, washed out for 21 days, and then crossed over. Patient's symptoms were determined using a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the severity of chest pain before and after each period.

RESULTS

Seventy-one percent of patients in the omeprazole arm reported improved chest pain, whereas only 18% in the placebo arm did. Abnormal results on manometry (20%), 24-hour pH monitoring (42%), or endoscopy with visual evidence of esophagitis (26%) were found less frequently. Combination of the three tests did not significantly increase their usefulness. In NCCP patients with GERD, as defined by positive results on a 24-hour pH test or presence of esophagitis on endoscopy, omeprazole treatment led to a response in 95% of patients, whereas 90% of GERD-positive patients treated with placebo did not respond. Of NCCP patients determined to be GERD negative, 39% responded to omeprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole as a first diagnostic tool in the evaluation of MIBI-negative NCCP is sensitive and specific for determining the cause of NCCP. Endoscopy, manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring were not only less sensitive in diagnosing NCCP, but they were significantly more expensive.

摘要

未加标注

非心源性胸痛(NCCP)是一个常见的诊断难题,患者往往使用了不成比例的医疗保健资源。胃食管反流病(GERD)是NCCP最常见的病因。

目标

测试一种强效抑酸剂作为NCCP评估诊断试验的疗效,并将其与三种常用试验进行比较。

研究

18名男性和24名女性,年龄在22至77岁之间,他们因非心源性病因出现复发性胸痛,经静息/负荷锝Tc99m甲氧基异丁基异腈(MIBI)灌注显像确定后,参加了一项使用高剂量奥美拉唑的前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验。37名患者完成了试验的两个阶段。将结果与内镜检查、测压和动态24小时双通道食管pH监测的结果进行比较。所有患者均接受了初步诊断性上消化道内镜检查、食管测压和24小时pH监测。然后患者被随机分配接受安慰剂或奥美拉唑(40mg/d口服,每日两次)治疗14天,洗脱21天,然后交叉治疗。使用视觉模拟量表确定患者在每个阶段前后胸痛的严重程度。

结果

奥美拉唑组71%的患者报告胸痛改善,而安慰剂组只有18%的患者胸痛改善。测压异常(20%)、24小时pH监测异常(42%)或内镜检查有食管炎视觉证据(26%)的情况较少见。三项检查联合使用并未显著提高其效用。在24小时pH试验结果为阳性或内镜检查有食管炎的GERD定义的NCCP患者中,奥美拉唑治疗使95%的患者有反应,而90%接受安慰剂治疗的GERD阳性患者无反应。在确定为GERD阴性的NCCP患者中,39%对奥美拉唑有反应。

结论

奥美拉唑作为评估MIBI阴性NCCP的首要诊断工具,对确定NCCP的病因敏感且特异。内镜检查、测压和24小时pH监测不仅在诊断NCCP时敏感性较低,而且费用显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验