Frank L, Kleinman L, Farup C, Taylor L, Miner P
Center for Health Outcomes Research, MEDTAP International, Inc., and MEDTAP Systems, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 Sep;34(9):870-7. doi: 10.1080/003655299750025327.
Clinical management of constipation is complicated by the lack of a gold standard for evaluation of symptoms. A constipation symptom assessment instrument, the PAC-SYM, was developed to address the patient perspective on the disorder. Instrument content was based on literature review and results of focus groups.
Two hundred and sixteen patients at nine sites participated in a 6-week psychometric evaluation of the PAC-SYM. The final instrument contained 12 items assigned to 3 subscales: stool symptoms, rectal symptoms, and abdominal symptoms. The psychometric properties of this final instrument were assessed.
Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the final instrument was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89; intraclass correlation = 0.75). Concurrent validity was supported by the correlation with both subject and investigator constipation severity ratings (r= 0.68 and 0.72, respectively; P < 0.0001). Scores were moderately correlated with instruments measuring quality of life. Comparison of treatment responders with nonresponders showed the ability of the instrument to differentiate between groups on the basis of clinical severity (t = -6.12, P < 0.0001 ). Scores changed significantly over time among responders, indicating instrument responsiveness.
The PAC-SYM is internally consistent, reproducible under stable conditions, valid, and responsive to change and provides a comprehensive means to assess the effectiveness of treatment for constipation.
便秘的临床管理因缺乏症状评估的金标准而变得复杂。为了从患者角度解决这一疾病问题,开发了一种便秘症状评估工具——PAC - SYM。工具内容基于文献综述和焦点小组的结果。
来自九个地点的216名患者参与了PAC - SYM为期6周的心理测量评估。最终工具包含12个项目,分为3个分量表:粪便症状、直肠症状和腹部症状。对该最终工具的心理测量特性进行了评估。
最终工具的内部一致性和重测信度较高(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.89;组内相关系数 = 0.75)。与受试者和研究者的便秘严重程度评分的相关性支持了同时效度(分别为r = 0.68和0.72;P < 0.0001)。得分与测量生活质量的工具呈中度相关。治疗反应者与无反应者的比较显示该工具能够根据临床严重程度区分不同组(t = -6.12,P < 0.0001)。反应者的得分随时间显著变化,表明该工具具有反应性。
PAC - SYM具有内部一致性,在稳定条件下可重复,有效且对变化有反应,并提供了一种全面的方法来评估便秘治疗的有效性。