• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A double-blind, randomized, controlled multicentre study to compare the efficacy of ciprofloxacin with pivampicillin as oral therapy for epididymitis in men over 40 years of age.

作者信息

Eickhoff J H, Frimodt-Møller N, Walter S, Frimodt-Møller C

机构信息

Glostrup Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

BJU Int. 1999 Nov;84(7):827-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00252.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00252.x
PMID:10532980
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily with pivampicillin 700 mg orally twice daily for 10 days in men with acute epididymitis and over 40 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 172 men who entered a prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind, trial of pivampicillin and ciprofloxacin. The median (range) age of the 158 patients eligible for the efficacy analysis was 58 (41-85) years; 41% had previously had a urinary tract infection and 27% had previously had epididymitis. Only one patient had a urethral catheter and 38% were sexually active. About half of the patients were admitted to hospital.

RESULTS

No bacteria could be cultured from samples in 53% of the patients; Escherichia coli could be cultured from 35% and the remaining isolates were the expected urinary pathogens. None of the patients had Gonococci and only one in each group had Chlamydia. Mycoplasma hominis was detected in three patients only and M. genitalium was detected in three, while Ureaplasma was detected in 24 (15%). The treatment failed in 48 patients; in 15 of 76 (20%) receiving ciprofloxacin and in 33 of 82 (40%) receiving pivampicillin. This corresponds to a reduction in the risk of failure of 20.5% (95% confidence limits 6.6-40.2%, P=0. 006). The principal cause of failure was an unsatisfactory clinical response requiring changed antibiotic treatment in 27 patients; adverse events were responsible for failure in 14. The in vitro resistance of cultured bacteria was low in both groups, at approximately 4%. Adverse events, mainly gastro-intestinal, occurred in 17 of 83 (21%) patients starting on ciprofloxacin and in 33 of 89 (37%) receiving pivampicillin (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

For epididymitis in men over the age of 40 years ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily is more effective than pivampicillin 700 mg orally twice daily. Furthermore, ciprofloxacin has a lower incidence of adverse events.

摘要

相似文献

1
A double-blind, randomized, controlled multicentre study to compare the efficacy of ciprofloxacin with pivampicillin as oral therapy for epididymitis in men over 40 years of age.
BJU Int. 1999 Nov;84(7):827-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00252.x.
2
[Ciprofloxacin and pivampicillin in acute epididymitis in men above the age of 40 years].环丙沙星和匹氨西林治疗40岁以上男性急性附睾炎
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Feb 14;162(7):936-9.
3
Optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in older women: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.老年女性单纯性尿路感染抗生素治疗的最佳疗程:一项双盲随机对照试验
CMAJ. 2004 Feb 17;170(4):469-73.
4
Once daily, extended release ciprofloxacin for complicated urinary tract infections and acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis.每日一次,使用缓释环丙沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染和急性单纯性肾盂肾炎。
J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):734-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000106191.11936.64.
5
Gatifloxacin 400 mg as a single shot or 200 mg once daily for 3 days is as effective as ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections.加替沙星400毫克单次注射或每日200毫克连用3天,在治疗非复杂性尿路感染患者方面与环丙沙星每日250毫克分两次服用的效果相同。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Jun;23(6):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.12.017.
6
Azithromycin versus pivampicillin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a single-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study.阿奇霉素与匹氨西林治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效比较:一项单盲、双模拟、多中心研究。
J Int Med Res. 2000 May-Jun;28(3):101-10. doi: 10.1177/147323000002800301.
7
Pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin in complicated urinary tract infection. Double-blind comparison of the combination pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and pivmecillinam alone in patients with urinary tract infection.
J Int Med Res. 1981;9(4):283-7. doi: 10.1177/030006058100900409.
8
Oral fosfomycin versus ciprofloxacin in women with E.coli febrile urinary tract infection, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (FORECAST).口服磷霉素与环丙沙星治疗大肠埃希菌致女性发热性尿路感染的双盲安慰剂对照随机对照非劣效试验(FORECAST)。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3562-2.
9
A double-blind, randomized comparison of levofloxacin 750 mg once-daily for five days with ciprofloxacin 400/500 mg twice-daily for 10 days for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis.一项双盲、随机对照研究,比较每日一次服用750毫克左氧氟沙星共五天与每日两次服用400/500毫克环丙沙星共十天用于治疗复杂性尿路感染和急性肾盂肾炎的疗效。
Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.002.
10
Single-dose fluoroquinolone therapy of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing single-dose to 3-day fluoroquinolone regimens.女性急性单纯性尿路感染的单剂量氟喹诺酮治疗:一项随机、双盲、多中心试验的结果,比较单剂量与3天氟喹诺酮治疗方案。
Urology. 2002 Mar;59(3):334-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01562-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Lycopene's therapeutic mechanisms in epididymitis: a network pharmacology and experimental study.番茄红素在附睾炎中的治疗机制:一项网络药理学与实验研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2553-2569. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-567. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Weighing Potential Benefits and Harms of Mycoplasma genitalium Testing and Treatment Approaches.权衡支原体生殖器检测和治疗方法的潜在益处和危害。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;28(8). doi: 10.3201/eid2808.220094.
3
: A new superbug.一种新型超级细菌。
Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2022 Jan-Jun;43(1):1-12. doi: 10.4103/ijstd.ijstd_103_20. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Is Non-Chlamydial Non-Gonococcal Urethritis Associated with Significant Clinical Complications in Men? A Systematic Review.非衣原体非淋菌性尿道炎与男性严重临床并发症有关吗?一项系统评价。
Curr Urol. 2020 Mar;14(1):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000499266. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Infections of the kidneys and the genito-urinary tract.细菌性感染的肠外初始治疗方案:肾脏及泌尿生殖道感染。
GMS Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 26;8:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/id000056. eCollection 2020.
6
Infectious, inflammatory and 'autoimmune' male factor infertility: how do rodent models inform clinical practice?感染性、炎症性和“自身免疫性”男性因素不孕:啮齿动物模型如何为临床实践提供信息?
Hum Reprod Update. 2018 Jul 1;24(4):416-441. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy009.
7
Epididymo-orchitis caused by enteric organisms in men > 35 years old: beyond fluoroquinolones.肠源性生物体引起的 35 岁以上男性附睾炎:超越氟喹诺酮类药物。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;37(6):1001-1008. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3212-z. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
Developmental origins of male subfertility: role of infection, inflammation, and environmental factors.男性不育的发育起源:感染、炎症和环境因素的作用。
Semin Immunopathol. 2016 Nov;38(6):765-781. doi: 10.1007/s00281-016-0576-y. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
Epididymitis: revelations at the convergence of clinical and basic sciences.附睾炎:临床与基础科学交叉领域的新发现
Asian J Androl. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):756-63. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.155770.
10
Mycoplasma genitalium: from Chrysalis to multicolored butterfly.生殖道支原体:从蛹到五彩蝴蝶。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Jul;24(3):498-514. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-11.