Sirolli V, Ballone E, Amoroso L, Di Liberato L, Di Mascio R, Capelli P, Albertazzi A, Bonomini M
Institute of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Italy.
Int J Artif Organs. 1999 Aug;22(8):536-42.
Membranes made from synthetic polymers, in general, are considered as being biocompatible membranes and tend to be treated as a homogeneous group. However, all of these membranes have multiple and different characteristics that may contribute to interactions with blood components. As a consequence, the biocompatibility profile of synthetic membranes may vary. In the present cross-over study, we examined by flow cytometry the effects (expressed as % change from predialysis values) of three different synthetic polymers (polysulfone, PSF; polyacrylonitrile-co-sodium methallyl sulfonate, AN69; ethylenevinylalcohol, EVAL) on the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules (CD11b/CD18, CD15s) and the interactions between leukocytes and platelets under conditions of routine clinical use. For neutrophils, a statistically significant difference was found in CD15s expression for EVAL as compared to AN69 (p<0.05) and in CD11b/CD18 expression for PSF as compared to both EVAL (p<0.01) and AN69 (p<0.05). No difference between membranes was found on the expression of such adhesive molecules on monocytes. Significant differences in platelet-neutrophil (but not in platelet-monocyte) coaggregate formation were observed between PSF and both EVAL (p<0.001) and AN69 (p<0.01). Reactive oxygen species production by neutrophil population during hemodialysis was significantly different between each pair of synthetic polymers (PSF vs EVAL, p<0.001; PSF vs AN69, p<0.001; AN69 vs EVAL, p<0.05). Our data demonstrate that in terms of leukocyte adhesion receptors and platelet-leukocyte interactions, the biocompatibility profile of the synthetic membranes polysulphone, AN69 and EVAL shows many similarities but also several significant differences. Our results support the concept that biocompatibility evaluation of each membrane should be based exclusively on data generated by that membrane in order to avoid errors based on assumptions about group characteristics.
一般来说,由合成聚合物制成的膜被认为是生物相容性膜,并往往被视为一个同质的类别。然而,所有这些膜都具有多种不同的特性,这些特性可能会导致与血液成分发生相互作用。因此,合成膜的生物相容性特征可能会有所不同。在本交叉研究中,我们通过流式细胞术研究了三种不同的合成聚合物(聚砜,PSF;聚丙烯腈 - 甲代烯丙基磺酸钠共聚物,AN69;乙烯 - 乙烯醇共聚物,EVAL)在常规临床使用条件下对白细胞粘附分子(CD11b/CD18,CD15s)表达以及白细胞与血小板之间相互作用的影响(以相对于透析前值的变化百分比表示)。对于中性粒细胞,与AN69相比,EVAL的CD15s表达存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05);与EVAL(p<0.01)和AN69(p<0.05)相比,PSF的CD11b/CD18表达存在统计学显著差异。在单核细胞上,这些粘附分子的表达在不同膜之间未发现差异。在PSF与EVAL(p<0.001)和AN69(p<0.01)之间观察到血小板 - 中性粒细胞(但血小板 - 单核细胞之间未观察到)共聚集形成存在显著差异。在血液透析期间,每对合成聚合物之间中性粒细胞群体产生的活性氧种类存在显著差异(PSF与EVAL,p<0.001;PSF与AN69,p<0.001;AN69与EVAL,p<0.05)。我们的数据表明,就白细胞粘附受体和血小板 - 白细胞相互作用而言,合成膜聚砜、AN69和EVAL的生物相容性特征显示出许多相似之处,但也存在一些显著差异。我们的结果支持这样一种观念,即每种膜的生物相容性评估应仅基于该膜产生的数据,以避免基于对类别特征的假设而产生的错误。