Suppr超能文献

糖尿病的成本。文献的方法学分析。

Costs of diabetes. A methodological analysis of the literature.

作者信息

Pagano E, Brunetti M, Tediosi F, Garattini L

机构信息

Center for Health Economics CESAV, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jun;15(6):583-95. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915060-00006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review studies on the costs of diabetes and its complications through a scheme designed specifically for assessing the quality of cost-of-illness (COI) studies.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The methodology of COI studies in diabetes was analysed in order to assess the significance of quantitative results. The scheme adopted 7 items identified as the main points for discussing the methodological choices governing the results. We also used a checklist based on questions related to the 7 items.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The answers showed that many studies appear not to give technical details, so it is hard to understand the method. Methodological choices varied widely between the studies. This is probably due to the lack of consensus on the methodology of COI studies. Based on the findings of this review, we suggest also some specific points that could help produce more reliable results on the costs of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Clearly, a general consensus on COI studies is still remote, making the value of any comparison of results questionable.

摘要

目的

通过专门设计用于评估疾病成本(COI)研究质量的方案,回顾有关糖尿病及其并发症成本的研究。

设计与背景

分析糖尿病领域COI研究的方法,以评估定量结果的重要性。该方案采用7项内容作为讨论影响结果的方法选择要点。我们还使用了基于与这7项内容相关问题的清单。

主要结局指标与结果

答案显示,许多研究似乎未给出技术细节,因此难以理解其方法。各项研究之间的方法选择差异很大。这可能是由于在COI研究方法上缺乏共识。基于本综述的结果,我们还提出了一些有助于得出更可靠的糖尿病成本结果的具体要点。

结论

显然,在COI研究方面仍远未达成普遍共识,这使得任何结果比较的价值都值得怀疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验