Jung H J, Varel V H, Weimer P J, Ralph J
USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Plant Science Research Unit and U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Cluster, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
J Agric Food Chem. 1999 May;47(5):2005-8. doi: 10.1021/jf981250q.
An accurate method for estimation of lignin concentration is important for prediction of the digestible energy content of livestock feeds. The accuracy of lignin concentration estimates based on the Klason lignin and acid detergent lignin methods was compared. Ten diverse forage samples were analyzed for protein, carbohydrates, lipids, organic acids, ash, lignin (by both methods), and gross energy. The accuracy of the two lignin concentration estimates was examined by comparing the measured forage gross energy to a gross energy value calculated from the compositional analysis. Use of the acid detergent lignin estimate in this gross energy calculation accounted for 68-84% of the forage gross energy compared to 85-97% of the gross energy using Klason lignin. These results indicate that while Klason lignin estimates are substantially higher than acid detergent lignin estimates, Klason lignin is the more accurate lignin method and does not overestimate lignin because gross energy recoveries were less than 100%.
准确估算木质素浓度的方法对于预测家畜饲料的可消化能量含量很重要。比较了基于克拉斯森木质素法和酸性洗涤木质素法估算木质素浓度的准确性。对十个不同的草料样本进行了蛋白质、碳水化合物、脂质、有机酸、灰分、木质素(两种方法)和总能分析。通过将测得的草料总能与根据成分分析计算出的总能值进行比较,检验了两种木质素浓度估算的准确性。在该总能计算中,使用酸性洗涤木质素估算值占草料总能的68 - 84%,而使用克拉斯森木质素占总能的85 - 97%。这些结果表明,虽然克拉斯森木质素估算值远高于酸性洗涤木质素估算值,但克拉斯森木质素是更准确的木质素方法,且不会高估木质素,因为总能回收率低于100%。