Thorne S
University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver, Canada.
Qual Health Res. 1998 Jul;8(4):547-55. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800408.
Although secondary analysis holds considerable promise for optimizing the health knowledge that can be constructed in relation to existing qualitative databases, methodological developments to guide design and evaluation of this research have not been fully explored in the qualitative research literature. This article extends preliminary methodological explorations to address two specific concerns arising from secondary analysis: ethics and representation. Because secondary research creates the potential for exaggerating certain errors in both ethics and representation, the risks associated with such analyses must be considered in the light of the opportunities. Preliminary strategies for helping secondary qualitative researchers to articulate and resolve the representational and ethical problems that may arise from their work are offered.
尽管二次分析在优化与现有定性数据库相关的健康知识构建方面具有巨大潜力,但定性研究文献尚未充分探讨指导此类研究设计和评估的方法发展。本文扩展了初步的方法探索,以解决二次分析中出现的两个具体问题:伦理和代表性。由于二次研究有可能夸大伦理和代表性方面的某些错误,因此必须根据机会来考虑此类分析相关的风险。本文提供了初步策略,以帮助二次定性研究人员阐明并解决其工作中可能出现的代表性和伦理问题。