Ullrich Charlotte, Jünger Saskia, Kremeike Kerstin, Xyländer Margret, Preiser Christine
UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hochschule für Gesundheit, Department of Community Health, Bochum, Germany.
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Apr;85(4):395-402. doi: 10.1055/a-1714-8505. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
Health services research is multidisciplinary and involves the use of a plurality of research methods. Medicine as a discipline serves as an important reference, also in terms of addressing ethics issues in research. At the same time, however, the highly formalized ethical reviews common in medicine, are controversial within the social sciences, especially among qualitative researchers. So far, little is known about which research ethics issues arise in qualitative health services research.
In summer 2019, an online survey was conducted among health services researchers on two main topics: a) research ethics issues in qualitative health services research and b) experiences with the ethics review procedures. The questionnaire contained ten open questions; the responses were analyzed for content. The first topic (ethical issues) is addressed within this article.
A total of 73 researchers with heterogeneous professional background and an average of more than seven years of work experience in health services research participated in the survey. The following were reported as central research ethics issues: a) legitimacy and anticipation of ethical challenges in the planning of research, b) field access, consent and burdens during data collection, c) anonymization and data protection in data processing, d) data analysis, e) publication of results and data and f) general topics such as central principles and goals of research as well as the role of researchers. The main formats for dealing with these issues were exchange and consultation as well as referring to texts and regulations.
On the one hand, the data documents typical central research ethics questions that researchers are confronted with in the context of qualitative health services research; on the other hand, they also point to gaps and less considered topics. A systematizing ethical reflection could take up these findings in order to develop health services research-specific principles and strategies for handling research ethics issues.
卫生服务研究是多学科的,涉及多种研究方法的运用。医学作为一门学科,在解决研究中的伦理问题方面也起着重要的参考作用。然而,与此同时,医学中常见的高度形式化的伦理审查在社会科学领域存在争议,尤其是在定性研究人员中。到目前为止,对于定性卫生服务研究中出现哪些研究伦理问题知之甚少。
2019年夏季,针对卫生服务研究人员开展了一项关于两个主要主题的在线调查:a)定性卫生服务研究中的研究伦理问题;b)伦理审查程序的经验。问卷包含十个开放式问题;对回答进行了内容分析。本文讨论的是第一个主题(伦理问题)。
共有73名具有不同专业背景且在卫生服务研究领域平均有七年以上工作经验的研究人员参与了调查。以下被报告为核心研究伦理问题:a)研究规划中伦理挑战的合法性和预期;b)实地准入、数据收集期间的同意和负担;c)数据处理中的匿名化和数据保护;d)数据分析;e)结果和数据的发表;f)诸如研究的核心原则和目标以及研究人员的角色等一般主题。处理这些问题的主要方式是交流与协商以及参考文本和法规。
一方面,数据记录了定性卫生服务研究背景下研究人员面临的典型核心研究伦理问题;另一方面也指出了差距和较少被考虑的主题。系统化的伦理反思可以借鉴这些发现,以制定针对卫生服务研究的处理研究伦理问题的原则和策略。