Rubenfeld G D, Caldwell E, Granton J, Hudson L D, Matthay M A
Harborview Medical Center and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98104, USA.
Chest. 1999 Nov;116(5):1347-53. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.5.1347.
Acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS are currently defined by the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) definition criteria, which contain a radiographic criterion. The accuracy or reliability of this consensus radiographic definition has not been evaluated, and no radiographic definition of ALI-ARDS has been evaluated by a large international group of experts.
To study the interobserver variability in applying the AECC radiographic criterion for ALI-ARDS.
Survey.
A convenience sample of 21 experts selected from participants attending the 1997 Toronto Mechanical Ventilation Workshop and from members of the National Institutes of Health ARDS Network.
Participants reviewed 28 randomly selected chest radiograph from critically ill, hypoxemic (PaO(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, < 300) patients and decided whether the radiograph fulfilled the AECC definition for ALI-ARDS.
Interobserver agreement in applying the AECC definition for ALI-ARDS was moderate (kappa = 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.57). Thirteen radiographs (43%) showed nearly complete agreement (defined as 20 or 21 readers in agreement). Nine radiographs (32%) had more than or equal to five dissenting readers. The percentage of radiographs interpreted as consistent with ALI-ARDS by individual readers ranged from 36 to 71%. Participants commented that mild infiltrates, pleural effusions, atelectasis, isolated lower lobe involvement, radiographic technique, and overlying monitoring equipment posed the most difficulties.
The radiographic criterion used in the current AECC definition for ALI-ARDS showed high interobserver variability when applied by expert investigators in the fields of mechanical ventilation and ARDS. This variability may result in differences in ALI-ARDS populations at different clinical research centers and may make it difficult for clinicians to apply the results of clinical trials to their patients. Modifications to the radiographic criterion or annotated reference radiograph may improve the reliability of future definitions for ALI-ARDS.
急性肺损伤(ALI)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)目前是根据欧美共识会议(AECC)的定义标准来定义的,该标准包含一项影像学标准。这一共识影像学定义的准确性或可靠性尚未得到评估,且尚无由一大国际专家组评估的ALI-ARDS影像学定义。
研究应用AECC的ALI-ARDS影像学标准时观察者间的变异性。
调查。
从参加1997年多伦多机械通气研讨会的人员以及美国国立卫生研究院ARDS网络的成员中选取的21名专家组成的便利样本。
参与者查看了28张从重症、低氧血症(动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数比值<300)患者中随机选取的胸部X光片,并判定该X光片是否符合AECC的ALI-ARDS定义。
应用AECC的ALI-ARDS定义时观察者间的一致性为中等(kappa=0.55;95%置信区间,0.52至0.57)。13张X光片(43%)显示几乎完全一致(定义为20或21位读者意见一致)。9张X光片(32%)有5名或更多持不同意见的读者。各读者判定为与ALI-ARDS一致的X光片百分比在36%至71%之间。参与者评论称,轻度浸润、胸腔积液、肺不张、仅下叶受累、影像学技术以及上方的监测设备造成的困难最大。
当前AECC的ALI-ARDS定义中使用的影像学标准,在机械通气和ARDS领域的专家研究者应用时显示出较高的观察者间变异性。这种变异性可能导致不同临床研究中心的ALI-ARDS人群存在差异,并可能使临床医生难以将临床试验结果应用于其患者。对影像学标准或有注释的参考X光片进行修改,可能会提高未来ALI-ARDS定义的可靠性。