• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项改善哮喘儿童及青少年吸入技术的干预措施。

An intervention to improve the inhalatory technique of children and adolescents with asthma.

作者信息

Gracia-Antequera M, Morales Suárez-Varela M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, 46017, España.

出版信息

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1999 Sep-Oct;27(5):255-60.

PMID:10568875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

most patients use their inhalers incorrectly and recent asthma management clinical guidelines recommend demonstrating skills and correcting performance at each asthma follow-up visit. However, this statement is poorly evidence-based and few intervention studies have assessed quantitatively the effectiveness of this recommendation.

METHODS

from a total of 3,076 children and adolescents with asthma attending an outpatient clinic, a random, representative sample of 255 was obtained and assessed at baseline with a standardised questionnaire regarding their skills when using one of three inhaler devices: pressurised direct aerosol (PDA), dry powder (DP) and aerosol pressurised in expanded camera (APEC). Structured sessions of correct use and handling of inhalers were offered and a new assessment was undertaken after an average of 10.5 months (SD 4.5).

RESULTS

only 142 asthmatics maintained the same inhaler device during the study period. An increase of correct manoeuvres was observed for all three devices, and the relative risk and 95% confidence interval (RR and 95% CI) of incorrect post-intervention use was 0.23 (95% CI 0.10-0.56) for PDA, 0.59 (95% CI 0.38-0.92) for DP, and 0.54 (95% CI 0.32-0.90) for APEC. A multivariate analysis indicates that this improvement was observed irrespective of gender and age interval, and that it was even better when parents cooperated with medical and nursing staff.

CONCLUSIONS

a dramatic improvement in correct manoeuvres with any of three inhaler devices after active performance training was observed. This easy, highly effective, low cost (in terms of time and personnel) intervention should be routinely implemented in any control visit of asthmatics, leading to a better management of asthma.

摘要

背景

大多数患者吸入器使用方法不正确,近期哮喘管理临床指南建议在每次哮喘随访时展示使用技巧并纠正操作。然而,这一说法缺乏充分证据,很少有干预研究定量评估该建议的有效性。

方法

从3076名到门诊就诊的儿童和青少年哮喘患者中,随机抽取255名具有代表性的样本,并在基线时用标准化问卷评估他们使用三种吸入装置之一的技巧,这三种装置分别是:压力定量气雾剂(PDA)、干粉吸入器(DP)和储雾罐压力定量气雾剂(APEC)。提供了关于正确使用和操作吸入器的结构化培训课程,并在平均10.5个月(标准差4.5)后进行了新的评估。

结果

在研究期间,只有142名哮喘患者一直使用同一种吸入装置。观察到所有三种装置的正确操作都有所增加,干预后使用错误的相对风险和95%置信区间(RR和95%CI),PDA为0.23(95%CI 0.10 - 0.56),DP为0.59(95%CI 0.38 - 0.92),APEC为0.54(95%CI 0.32 - 0.90)。多变量分析表明,无论性别和年龄区间如何,都观察到了这种改善,而且当父母与医护人员合作时改善更明显。

结论

在进行积极的操作培训后,观察到使用三种吸入装置中任何一种的正确操作都有显著改善。这种简单、高效、低成本(在时间和人力方面)的干预措施应在哮喘患者的任何一次控制访视中常规实施,从而实现更好的哮喘管理。

相似文献

1
An intervention to improve the inhalatory technique of children and adolescents with asthma.一项改善哮喘儿童及青少年吸入技术的干预措施。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1999 Sep-Oct;27(5):255-60.
2
Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician.吸入疗法培训:医师面临的一项首要挑战。
Acta Biomed. 2007 Dec;78(3):233-45.
3
Key issues in inhalation therapy in children.儿童吸入疗法中的关键问题。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21 Suppl 4:S27-32. doi: 10.1185/030079905X61767.
4
Skills amongst parents of children with asthma: a pilot interventional study in primary care setting.哮喘患儿家长的技能:在初级保健环境中的一项试点干预研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2006 Dec;61(5):534-9.
5
An evaluation of children's metered-dose inhaler technique for asthma medications.一项针对儿童使用哮喘药物的定量吸入器技术的评估。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;40(1):167-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2004.08.010.
6
Assessment of inhalation technique and determinants of incorrect performance among children with asthma.哮喘儿童吸入技术评估及吸入操作错误的影响因素
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Nov;41(11):1082-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20498.
7
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study of budesonide inhalation suspension in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids with a metered-dose or dry powder inhaler.一项为期12周的多中心、随机、部分盲法、活性药物对照、平行组研究,旨在评估布地奈德吸入混悬液用于此前使用定量气雾剂或干粉吸入器吸入皮质类固醇治疗的中度至重度持续性哮喘青少年和成人患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1013-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.005.
8
Improved asthma outcomes in a high-morbidity pediatric population: results of an emergency department-based randomized clinical trial.高发病率儿科人群哮喘治疗效果改善:一项基于急诊科的随机临床试验结果
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 May;160(5):535-41. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.5.535.
9
Retention by children of device technique for inhaled asthma drugs between visits.儿童在就诊期间对吸入性哮喘药物使用装置技术的掌握情况。
J Asthma. 2007 Nov;44(9):769-73. doi: 10.1080/02770900701645793.
10
A randomized controlled evaluation of specialist nurse education following accident and emergency department attendance for acute asthma.对急性哮喘患者在急诊科就诊后接受专科护士教育的随机对照评估。
Respir Med. 2000 Sep;94(9):900-8. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0861.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacist Led Intervention on Inhalation Technique among Asthmatic Patients for Improving Quality of Life in a Private Hospital of Nepal.尼泊尔一家私立医院中,药剂师主导的针对哮喘患者吸入技术的干预措施以改善生活质量
Pulm Med. 2019 Nov 24;2019:8217901. doi: 10.1155/2019/8217901. eCollection 2019.
2
A comparative analysis of errors in inhaler technique among COPD versus asthma patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者与哮喘患者吸入器技术错误的比较分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Sep 24;13:2941-2947. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S178951. eCollection 2018.
3
Metered-dose inhaler technique among healthcare providers practising in Oman.
阿曼医疗保健提供者的定量吸入器技术。
J Sci Res Med Sci. 2001 Apr;3(1):39-43.
4
Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC: study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial).两种关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者吸入技术的教育干预措施的疗效。TECEPOC:一项部分随机对照试验(偏好试验)的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 May 21;13:64. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-64.