• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[The effects of propofol anesthesia with or without the use of nitrous oxide on the intraoperative involuntary movement, the postoperative awareness and vomiting].

作者信息

Nishijima S, Konno M, Sakurada H

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Hachinohe Red Cross Hospital.

出版信息

Masui. 1999 Nov;48(11):1216-9.

PMID:10586554
Abstract

The authors investigated the effect of anesthesia with nitrous oxide and propofol on intraoperative involuntary movement, muscle relaxant usage, postoperative nausea and vomiting, the total amount of propofol used, and recovery time from anesthesia. Eighty-eight patients for gynecological surgery were randomly divided into group PE: propofol/epidural (n = 44), and group PEG: propofol/epidural/nitrous oxide (n = 44). The frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed at 24-h postoperatively by blinded observers. There were significant decreases of the mean amounts of propofol and muscle relaxant used between group PEG and group PE. The authors found no correlation between the use of nitrous oxide and intraoperative involuntary movement, subsequent development of postoperative quality of awareness, recovery time, nausea and vomiting. We recommend PEG method for gynecological surgery rather than PE from an economical viewpoint because it is associated with the reduction of mean propofol and muscle relaxant used.

摘要

相似文献

1
[The effects of propofol anesthesia with or without the use of nitrous oxide on the intraoperative involuntary movement, the postoperative awareness and vomiting].
Masui. 1999 Nov;48(11):1216-9.
2
Comparison of the anesthesia profiles between sevoflurane-nitrous oxide and propofol-nitrous oxide conveyed by laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing ambulatory gynecological surgery.喉罩气道用于门诊妇科手术患者时七氟醚-氧化亚氮与丙泊酚-氧化亚氮麻醉效果的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2006 Jun;44(2):101-7.
3
Effect of nitrous oxide on post-operative nausea and vomiting during propofol anaesthesia for short surgical operations.氧化亚氮对短小手术丙泊酚麻醉期间术后恶心呕吐的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 Sep;10(5):337-41.
4
Post-operative nausea and vomiting in out-patient gynecologic laparoscopy: a comparison of thiopental-nitrous oxide, propofol-nitrous oxide and total intravenous anesthesia using propofol.门诊妇科腹腔镜手术后恶心呕吐:硫喷妥钠-氧化亚氮、丙泊酚-氧化亚氮与丙泊酚全静脉麻醉的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 May;84(5):697-704.
5
Propofol reduces prolonged outpatient PACU stay. An analysis according to surgical procedure.
Anesthesiol Rev. 1994 Jul-Aug;21(4):129-32.
6
[A comparison of the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after propofol-fentanyl anesthesia and that after nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia].丙泊酚-芬太尼麻醉与氧化亚氮-异氟烷麻醉术后恶心呕吐发生率的比较
Masui. 1998 Mar;47(3):286-9.
7
Effects on recovery when isoflurane is used to supplement propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia.异氟烷用于补充丙泊酚-氧化亚氮麻醉时对恢复的影响。
Anesth Analg. 1993 Oct;77(4 Suppl):S15-20.
8
[Prophylactic use of droperidol for postoperative nausea and vomiting following gynecological laparoscopic surgery under total intravenous anesthesia].[氟哌利多在全静脉麻醉下妇科腹腔镜手术后预防性用于恶心呕吐的研究]
Masui. 2006 Jan;55(1):55-8.
9
[Postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic abdominal surgery--a comparison of propofol versus inhalational technique].[妇科腹部手术后的术后恶心呕吐——丙泊酚与吸入技术的比较]
Masui. 1997 Nov;46(11):1465-9.
10
Nitrous oxide does not aggravate postoperative emesis after orthognathic surgery in female and nonsmoking patients.一氧化二氮不会加重女性和非吸烟患者正颌手术后的术后呕吐。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):936-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.283.

引用本文的文献

1
Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.手术期间预防术中知晓的麻醉干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 18;10(10):CD007272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007272.pub2.