Myles P S, Troedel S, Boquest M, Reeves M
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Alfred Hospital, Prahan, Victoria, Australia.
Anesth Analg. 1999 Dec;89(6):1517-20. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199912000-00038.
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain, yet controversy surrounds whether the VAS score is ratio or ordinal data. We studied 52 postoperative patients and measured their pain intensity using the VAS. We then asked them to consider different amounts of pain (conceptually twice as much and then half as much) and asked them to repeat their VAS rating after each consideration (VAS2 and VAS3, respectively). Patients with unrelieved pain had their pain treated with IV fentanyl and were then asked to rate their pain intensity when they considered they had half as much pain. We compared the baseline VAS (VAS1) with VAS2 and VAS3. The mean (95% confidence interval) for VAS2:1 was 2.12 (1.81-2.43) and VAS3:1 was 0.45 (0.38-0.52). We conclude that the VAS is linear for mild-to-moderate pain, and the VAS score can be treated as ratio data.
A change in the visual analog scale score represents a relative change in the magnitude of pain sensation. Use of the VAS in comparative analgesic trials can now meaningfully quantify differences in potency and efficacy.
视觉模拟评分法(VAS)是一种广泛用于测量疼痛的工具,但VAS评分是比率数据还是有序数据仍存在争议。我们研究了52例术后患者,并用VAS测量了他们的疼痛强度。然后我们让他们考虑不同程度的疼痛(概念上是两倍和一半),并在每次考虑后让他们重复VAS评分(分别为VAS2和VAS3)。疼痛未缓解的患者接受静脉注射芬太尼治疗,然后当他们认为疼痛减轻一半时,让他们对疼痛强度进行评分。我们将基线VAS(VAS1)与VAS2和VAS3进行了比较。VAS2:1的平均值(95%置信区间)为2.12(1.81 - 2.43),VAS3:1为0.45(0.38 - 0.52)。我们得出结论,对于轻至中度疼痛,VAS是线性的,VAS评分可视为比率数据。
视觉模拟评分法分数的变化代表疼痛感觉程度的相对变化。现在,在比较镇痛试验中使用VAS可以有意义地量化效力和疗效的差异。