Sakakibara Y, Mitsui T
Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki, Japan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Nov;22(11):1668-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00387.x.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the rate of seat belt use is influenced by the interaction between the seat belt shoulder strap and pacemaker generator. The participants (1,942 Japanese patients with pacemakers) were asked to respond to a questionnaire about their seating position in the vehicle, their actual use of seat belts, and the reasons for not wearing seat belts. Front seat occupants (drivers and front seat passengers) were divided into two groups according to the relation between the site of the seat belt shoulder strap and the pacemaker implantation site: group-1--seat belt ipsilateral to the pacemaker, and group-2--seat belts contralateral to the pacemaker. Of the 1,942 questionnaires sent by mail, 1,486 (76.5%) were completed and returned. The actual rates of seat belt use were as follows: drivers (n = 428), 67.4% in group 1 versus 81.0% in group 2 (P < 0.01):front seat passengers (n = 403), 63.7% in group 1 versus 70.1 % in group 2 (NS); rear seat passengers (n = 655), 26.6%. Among the front seat occupants, pain or an uncomfortable sensation were stated in 59.0% of group 1 versus 30.7% of group 2 (P < 0.01). The interaction between seat belts and pacemaker lowers the rate of seat belt use in patients with pacemakers. Pain or discomfort from seat belt-pacemaker contact was noted as the reason for not wearing a seat belt. Physicians should inquire about and take into account a patient's seating location in the vehicle and the location of the seat belt shoulder restraint. The pacemaker implantation site should be placed, if possible, contralateral to the seat belt.
本研究的目的是评估安全带肩带与起搏器发生器之间的相互作用是否会影响安全带的使用比例。研究参与者为1942名日本起搏器患者,他们被要求回答一份关于其在车内的就座位置、安全带的实际使用情况以及不系安全带原因的问卷。前排乘客(驾驶员和前排乘客)根据安全带肩带位置与起搏器植入位置的关系分为两组:第1组——安全带与起搏器同侧,第2组——安全带与起搏器对侧。在通过邮件发送的1942份问卷中,有1486份(76.5%)填写并返回。安全带的实际使用比例如下:驾驶员(n = 428),第1组为67.4%,第2组为81.0%(P < 0.01);前排乘客(n = 403),第1组为63.7%,第2组为70.1%(无统计学差异);后排乘客(n = 655),为26.6%。在前排乘客中,第1组有59.0%的人表示有疼痛或不适感,而第2组为30.7%(P < 0.01)。安全带与起搏器之间的相互作用降低了起搏器患者使用安全带的比例。因安全带与起搏器接触产生疼痛或不适被指出是不系安全带的原因。医生应询问并考虑患者在车内的就座位置以及安全带肩带的位置。如有可能,起搏器植入位置应与安全带对侧。