Attin T, Buchalla W, Gollner M, Hellwig E
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Caries Res. 2000 Jan-Feb;34(1):48-52. doi: 10.1159/000016569.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the period of remineralization needed to re-establish the resistance of eroded enamel against brushing abrasion. Enamel specimens were prepared from 84 polished bovine incisors. The samples were evenly distributed among 7 groups (A-G) and submitted to ten alternating de- and remineralization cycles which included abrasion by toothbrushing. Demineralization was accomplished by immersing the specimens in the erosive soft drink Sprite Light((R)) for 1 min. Remineralization was performed by storing the samples in artificial saliva for either 0 min (A), 10 min (B), 60 min (C) or 240 min (D). After each remineralization, the specimens were brushed in an automatic brushing machine. Group E (erosion and 240 min remineralization, but no brushing) group F (erosion, but no remineralization and no brushing), and group G (brushing, but no erosion and no remineralization) served as controls. After performing the cycles, loss of enamel was determined by profilometry. The following values (mean +/- SD) were obtained and statistically analyzed (p<0.05): group A (5.16+/-1.26 microm), B (2.47+/-0.68 microm), C (1.72+/-0.75 microm), D (1.11+/-0.42 microm), E (0.81+/-0. 23 microm), F (1.04+/-0.31 microm), G (0.22+/-0.15 microm). Only the differences between groups D, E, and F were statistically not significant. Under the chosen in vitro conditions, it is concluded that abrasion resistance of eroded enamel continuously increases with remineralization time. However, even after a period of 1 h of remineralization, abrasion of previously eroded enamel is increased
本研究的目的是评估重新建立被侵蚀牙釉质抵抗刷牙磨损所需的再矿化时间。从84颗抛光的牛切牙制备牙釉质标本。样本被均匀分配到7组(A - G),并经历十个交替的脱矿化和再矿化循环,其中包括刷牙磨损。通过将标本浸入侵蚀性软饮料雪碧轻怡(R)中1分钟来实现脱矿化。再矿化通过将样本储存在人工唾液中0分钟(A组)、10分钟(B组)、60分钟(C组)或240分钟(D组)来进行。每次再矿化后,标本在自动刷牙机中刷牙。E组(侵蚀和240分钟再矿化,但不刷牙)、F组(侵蚀,但不复矿化且不刷牙)和G组(刷牙,但无侵蚀且不复矿化)作为对照组。完成循环后,通过轮廓仪测定牙釉质的损失。获得以下值(平均值±标准差)并进行统计分析(p<0.05):A组(5.16±1.26微米)、B组(2.47±0.68微米)、C组(1.72±0.75微米)、D组(1.11±0.42微米)、E组(0.81±0.23微米)、F组(1.04±0.31微米)、G组(0.22±0.15微米)。只有D组、E组和F组之间的差异在统计学上不显著。在所选的体外条件下,得出结论:被侵蚀牙釉质的耐磨性随着再矿化时间的延长而持续增加。然而,即使经过1小时的再矿化,先前被侵蚀的牙釉质的磨损仍会增加