Fischer D, Ship J A
Department of Oral Medicine/Pathology/Oncology, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor 48109-1078, USA.
Age Ageing. 1999 Oct;28(6):557-61. doi: 10.1093/ageing/28.6.557.
although several reports indicate that qualitative and quantitative assessments of parotid salivary function are age-stable in healthy adults, there have been no studies of the influence of age on the variability of repeated parotid flow rates.
to examine the influence of age on the variability of repeated parotid flow rates in unmedicated, healthy adults.
we assessed unilateral unstimulated and 2% citrate-stimulated parotid flow rates and collected responses to a five-item subjective xerostomia questionnaire in 14 subjects aged 20-40 years and 14 subjects aged 60-80 years. All subjects were healthy and unmedicated. We collected saliva and asked subjects to complete the questionnaire at baseline, 1 h and 2 h.
unstimulated and stimulated parotid flow rates were similar at each time point in young and older subjects, and remained stable over the collection period. There were no differences in the standard deviations of the three collections of unstimulated and stimulated flow rates between young and older subjects. There were no differences between questionnaire responses between the two groups, and no change in response over time.
there is no increased age-related variability in parotid salivary flow rates over repeated measures. Stimulated parotid flow rates are stable over 2 h in healthy people, and are similar in young and older individuals. These results suggest that parotid glands have a large secretory reserve.
尽管有几份报告表明,健康成年人腮腺唾液功能的定性和定量评估在年龄方面是稳定的,但尚未有关于年龄对腮腺反复流速变异性影响的研究。
研究年龄对未用药的健康成年人腮腺反复流速变异性的影响。
我们评估了14名20 - 40岁受试者和14名60 - 80岁受试者单侧非刺激性和2%枸橼酸盐刺激性腮腺流速,并收集了他们对一份五项主观口干问卷的回答。所有受试者均健康且未用药。我们在基线、1小时和2小时收集唾液并让受试者完成问卷。
年轻和年长受试者在每个时间点的非刺激性和刺激性腮腺流速相似,且在收集期间保持稳定。年轻和年长受试者非刺激性和刺激性流速三次收集的标准差没有差异。两组问卷回答之间没有差异,且回答随时间没有变化。
在反复测量中,腮腺唾液流速与年龄相关的变异性没有增加。健康人刺激性腮腺流速在2小时内稳定,且在年轻人和老年人中相似。这些结果表明腮腺具有较大的分泌储备。