Halley J M, Kunin W E
Statistics Division, Mathematical Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9SS, United Kingdom.
Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Dec;56(3):215-30. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1424.
In order to predict extinction risk in the presence of reddened, or correlated, environmental variability, fluctuating parameters may be represented by the family of 1/f noises, a series of stochastic models with different levels of variation acting on different timescales. We compare the process of parameter estimation for three 1/f models (white, pink and brown noise) with each other, and with autoregressive noise models (which are not 1/f noises), using data from a model time-series (length, T) of population. We then calculate the expected increase in variance and the expected extinction risk for each model, and we use these to explore the implication of assuming an incorrect noise model. When parameterising these models, it is necessary to do so in terms of the measured ("sample") parameters rather than fundamental ("population") parameters. This is because these models are non-stationary: their parameters need not stabilize on measurement over long periods of time and are uniquely defined only over a specified "window" of timescales defined by a measurement process. We find that extinction forecasts can differ greatly between models, depending on the length, T, and the coefficient of variability, CV, of the time series used to parameterise the models, and on the length of time into the future which is to be projected. For the simplest possible models, ones with population itself the 1/f noise process, it is possible to predict the extinction risk based on CV of the observed time series. Our predictions, based on explicit formulae and on simulations, indicate that (a) for very short projection times relative to T, brown and pink noise models are usually optimistic relative to equivalent white noise model; (b) for projection timescales equal to and substantially greater than T, an equivalent brown or pink noise model usually predicts a greater extinction risk, unless CV is very large; and (c) except for very small values of CV, for timescales very much greater than T, the brown and pink models present a more optimistic picture than the white noise model. In most cases, a pink noise is intermediate between white and brown models. Thus, while reddening of environmental noise may increase the long-term extinction probability for stationary processes, this is not generally true for non-stationary processes, such as pink or brown noises.
为了预测在环境变化呈红色或相关情况下的灭绝风险,波动参数可以用1/f噪声族来表示,这是一系列在不同时间尺度上具有不同变化水平的随机模型。我们使用种群模型时间序列(长度为T)的数据,将三种1/f模型(白噪声、粉红噪声和布朗噪声)的参数估计过程相互比较,并与自回归噪声模型(不是1/f噪声)进行比较。然后,我们计算每个模型的方差预期增加量和灭绝风险预期值,并利用这些来探讨假设错误噪声模型的影响。在对这些模型进行参数化时,有必要根据测量到的(“样本”)参数而不是基本的(“总体”)参数来进行。这是因为这些模型是非平稳的:它们的参数在长时间测量中不一定会稳定下来,并且仅在由测量过程定义的特定时间尺度“窗口”内唯一确定。我们发现,不同模型之间的灭绝预测可能有很大差异,这取决于用于参数化模型的时间序列的长度T和变异系数CV,以及要预测的未来时间长度。对于最简单的模型,即种群本身就是1/f噪声过程的模型,可以根据观测时间序列的CV来预测灭绝风险。我们基于显式公式和模拟的预测表明:(a)对于相对于T非常短的预测时间,布朗噪声和粉红噪声模型相对于等效的白噪声模型通常较为乐观;(b)对于等于和远大于T的预测时间尺度,等效的布朗噪声或粉红噪声模型通常预测更大的灭绝风险,除非CV非常大;(c)除了CV非常小的值外,对于远大于T的时间尺度,布朗噪声和粉红噪声模型比白噪声模型呈现出更乐观的情况。在大多数情况下,粉红噪声介于白噪声和布朗噪声模型之间。因此,虽然环境噪声的红色化可能会增加平稳过程的长期灭绝概率,但对于非平稳过程,如粉红噪声或布朗噪声,情况通常并非如此。