• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生存曲线如何影响种群对气候变化的脆弱性。

How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.

机构信息

Department of Biological Applications and Technology, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Monterey Bay Aquarium, Monterey, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0203124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203124. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0203124
PMID:30188919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6126862/
Abstract

Human activities are exposing organisms not only to direct threats (e.g. habitat loss) but also to indirect environmental pressures such as climate change, which involves not just directional global warming but also increasing climatic variability. Such changes will impact whole communities of organisms and the possible effects on population dynamics have raised concerns about increased extinction rates. Conservation-minded approaches to extinction risk vary from range shifts predicted by climate envelope models with no population dynamics to population viability analyses that ignore environmental variability altogether. Our modelling study shows that these extremes are modelling responses to a spectrum of environmental sensitivity that organisms may exhibit. We show how the survival curve plays a major role in how environmental variability leads to population fluctuations. While it is often supposed that low-fecundity organisms (those with high parental investment) will be the most vulnerable to climate change, it is those with high fecundity (low parental investment) that are likely to be more sensitive to such changes. We also find that abundance variations in high fecundity populations is driven primarily by fluctuations in the survival of early life stages, the more so if those environmental changes are autocorrelated in time. We show which types of conservation actions are most appropriate for a number of real populations. While the most effective conservation actions for organisms of low fecundity is to avoid killing them, for populations with high fecundity (and low parental investment), our study suggests conservation should focus more on protecting early life stages from hostile environments.

摘要

人类活动不仅使生物直接面临威胁(例如栖息地丧失),还使它们间接承受环境压力,例如气候变化,气候变化不仅包括全球变暖的方向性变化,还包括气候变异性增加。这些变化将影响到整个生物群落,而其对种群动态的潜在影响引发了人们对灭绝率上升的担忧。考虑到灭绝风险的保护方法多种多样,从气候 envelope 模型预测的无种群动态的范围转移,到完全忽略环境变异性的种群生存力分析。我们的模型研究表明,这些极端情况是对生物体可能表现出的一系列环境敏感性的模型响应。我们展示了生存曲线如何在环境变异性导致种群波动方面发挥主要作用。尽管通常认为低生育率生物(那些具有高亲代投资的生物)最容易受到气候变化的影响,但那些具有高生育率(低亲代投资)的生物可能更容易受到此类变化的影响。我们还发现,高生育率种群的丰度变化主要是由早期生命阶段的生存波动驱动的,如果这些环境变化在时间上具有自相关性,则更是如此。我们展示了针对许多实际种群的最适当的保护行动类型。对于低生育率生物来说,最有效的保护行动是避免杀死它们,而对于高生育率(低亲代投资)的种群,我们的研究表明,保护应更侧重于保护早期生命阶段免受恶劣环境的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/710ef77b3608/pone.0203124.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/e5b32baa31cd/pone.0203124.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/63b05d857eac/pone.0203124.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/d6a0ff1df830/pone.0203124.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/710ef77b3608/pone.0203124.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/e5b32baa31cd/pone.0203124.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/63b05d857eac/pone.0203124.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/d6a0ff1df830/pone.0203124.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/765e/6126862/710ef77b3608/pone.0203124.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.生存曲线如何影响种群对气候变化的脆弱性。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0203124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203124. eCollection 2018.
2
Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction.第 4 章 鲨鱼、鳐鱼和银鲛的全球灭绝易感性。
Adv Mar Biol. 2009;56:275-363. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(09)56004-X.
3
Effects of climate change and variability on population dynamics in a long-lived shorebird.气候变化和变异性对长寿命涉禽种群动态的影响。
Ecology. 2010 Apr;91(4):1192-204. doi: 10.1890/09-0410.1.
4
Each life stage matters: the importance of assessing the response to climate change over the complete life cycle in butterflies.每个生命阶段都很重要:评估蝴蝶在整个生命周期内对气候变化的反应的重要性。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Jan;82(1):275-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02029.x. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
5
Frog population viability under present and future climate conditions: a Bayesian state-space approach.在当前和未来气候条件下的青蛙种群生存能力:贝叶斯状态空间方法。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Sep;81(5):978-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01992.x. Epub 2012 May 10.
6
Demographic consequences of climate change and land cover help explain a history of extirpations and range contraction in a declining snake species.气候变化和土地覆盖的人口统计学后果有助于解释一个衰落蛇种灭绝和范围缩小的历史。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jul;20(7):2087-99. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12510. Epub 2014 May 2.
7
Unravelling the annual cycle in a migratory animal: breeding-season habitat loss drives population declines of monarch butterflies.解读迁徙动物的年度周期:繁殖季节栖息地丧失导致帝王蝶种群数量下降。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):155-65. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12253. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
8
Climate warming alters effects of management on population viability of threatened species: results from a 30-year experimental study on a rare orchid.气候变暖改变了管理措施对受威胁物种种群生存力的影响:一项对珍稀兰花进行的 30 年实验研究结果。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Sep;19(9):2729-38. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12167. Epub 2013 Jul 14.
9
The intrinsic growth rate as a predictor of population viability under climate warming.内在增长率作为预测气候变暖下种群生存力的指标。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Nov;82(6):1240-53. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12112. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
10
Shifts in the relative fitness contributions of fecundity and survival in variable and changing environments.在多变和不断变化的环境中,生育力和存活率的相对适应度贡献发生变化。
J Exp Biol. 2021 Feb 24;224(Pt Suppl 1):jeb228031. doi: 10.1242/jeb.228031.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving wild animal welfare through contraception.通过避孕措施改善野生动物福利。
Bioscience. 2024 Sep 11;74(10):695-700. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biae071. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Measuring the shape of mortality across animals and plants: Alternatives to entropy metrics reveal hidden type IV survivorship curves and associations with parental care at macro-ecological scales.衡量动植物的死亡模式:熵度量的替代方法揭示了隐藏的IV型生存曲线以及宏观生态尺度下与亲代抚育的关联。
Ecol Evol. 2023 May 17;13(5):e10076. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10076. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Theoretical modeling and neritic monitoring of loggerhead Caretta caretta [Linnaeus, 1758] sea turtle sex ratio in the southeast United States do not substantiate fears of a male-limited population.

本文引用的文献

1
A life-history perspective on the demographic drivers of structured population dynamics in changing environments.变化环境中结构化种群动态的人口统计学驱动因素的生活史视角。
Ecol Lett. 2016 Sep;19(9):1023-31. doi: 10.1111/ele.12628. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
2
Juvenile recruitment in loggerhead sea turtles linked to decadal changes in ocean circulation.红海龟幼体的招募与海洋环流的十年变化有关。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Nov;22(11):3529-3538. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13331. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Environmental variation and population responses to global change.
理论模型和沿海水域监测结果表明,在美国东南部,红海龟(Caretta caretta [Linnaeus, 1758])的性别比例并未呈现出雄性局限性种群的特征,这与人们的担忧不符。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Oct;27(19):4849-4859. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15808. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
4
North Pacific warming shifts the juvenile range of a marine apex predator.北太平洋变暖改变了一种海洋顶级捕食者的幼鱼分布范围。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 9;11(1):3373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82424-9.
5
Towards a global understanding of the drivers of marine and terrestrial biodiversity.为了全球范围内理解海洋和陆地生物多样性的驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228065. eCollection 2020.
6
Implications of salep collection for the conservation of the Elder-flowered orchid () in Epirus, Greece.希腊伊庇鲁斯地区采集白藓皮对老鹳草兰(学名:Epipactis helleborine)保护的影响。
J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2019 Dec 30;26:18. doi: 10.1186/s40709-019-0110-1. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Toward a metabolic theory of life history.迈向生命史的代谢理论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 26;116(52):26653-26661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907702116. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Densities and drivers of sea turtle populations across Pacific coral reef ecosystems.太平洋珊瑚礁生态系统中海龟种群的密度和驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0214972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214972. eCollection 2019.
环境变化与人口对全球变化的响应。
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jul;18(7):724-36. doi: 10.1111/ele.12437. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Fishing amplifies forage fish population collapses.捕鱼加剧了饵料鱼种群的崩溃。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 26;112(21):6648-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422020112. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
5
Terrestrial basking sea turtles are responding to spatio-temporal sea surface temperature patterns.陆栖晒太阳的海龟正在对时空海表温度模式做出反应。
Biol Lett. 2015 Jan;11(1):20140744. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0744.
6
Historical versus contemporary climate forcing on the annual nesting variability of loggerhead sea turtles in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean.历史与当代气候强迫对西北大西洋蠵龟年度筑巢变异性的影响
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 5;8(12):e81097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081097. eCollection 2013.
7
Incorporating climate science in applications of the US endangered species act for aquatic species.将气候科学纳入美国濒危物种法在水生物种中的应用。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Dec;27(6):1222-33. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12166.
8
How life history influences population dynamics in fluctuating environments.生物历史如何影响波动环境中的种群动态。
Am Nat. 2013 Dec;182(6):743-59. doi: 10.1086/673497. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
Evidence for an age-dependent influence of environmental variations on a long-lived seabird's life-history traits.证明环境变化对长寿海鸟生活史特征的影响具有年龄依赖性。
Ecology. 2013 Jan;94(1):208-20. doi: 10.1890/12-0215.1.
10
Resource requirements of the Pacific leatherback turtle population.太平洋丽龟种群的资源需求。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045447. Epub 2012 Oct 5.