Goujard J
INSERM Unité 149 and Registre des Malformations Congénitales de Paris, France.
Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;15(9):853-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1007530216916.
Published reports of clusters of congenital anomalies, traditionally defined as an aggregation in time and/or space of malformed cases, are interesting to analyse in terms of emergence, management and initiator of a public health decision. Through some examples of clusters for which a suspected source has been suggested, for those having identified important causal relationship or for those where the cluster appeared without any explanation, the paper shows the different steps that were taken after the initial 'alarm' and the time spent between the alarm and a final conclusion. If basic keys such as accurate field investigation, reliable estimation of the expected number and etiological evaluation, are the rule, the handling should remain flexible to take into account the particularity of each cluster. Among the clusters of congenital anomalies published in the last 20 years, very few of them were clearly explained.
已发表的关于先天性异常聚集的报告,传统上定义为畸形病例在时间和/或空间上的聚集,从公共卫生决策的出现、管理和发起者的角度进行分析很有意思。通过一些已提出疑似病因的聚集病例实例、那些已确定重要因果关系的实例或那些无任何解释就出现的聚集病例实例,本文展示了在最初的“警报”之后所采取的不同步骤以及从警报发出到得出最终结论所花费的时间。如果像准确的现场调查、预期数量的可靠估计和病因学评估等基本要点是准则的话,那么处理方式应保持灵活,以考虑到每个聚集病例的特殊性。在过去20年发表的先天性异常聚集病例中,很少有能得到明确解释的。