Elber A R, Stegeman A, Moser H, Ekker H M, Smak J A, Pluimers F H
Department of Pig Health, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):157-84. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00074-4.
The objective of this paper is to describe the severe epidemic of classical swine fever (CSF) in The Netherlands in 1997-1998 under a policy of non-vaccination, intensive surveillance, pre-emptive slaughter and stamping out in an area which has one of the highest pig and herd densities in Europe. The primary outbreak was detected on 4 February 1997 on a mixed sow and finishing pig herd. A total of 429 outbreaks was observed during the epidemic, and approximately 700,000 pigs from these herds were slaughtered. Among these outbreaks were two artificial insemination centres, which resulted in a CSF-suspect declaration of 1680 pig herds (mainly located in the southern part of The Netherlands). The time between introduction of CSF virus (CSFV) into the country and diagnosis of CSF in the primary outbreak was estimated to be approximately 6 weeks. It is presumed that CSFV was spread from The Netherlands to Italy and Spain via shipment of infected piglets in the beginning of February 1997, before the establishment of a total stand-still of transportation. In June 1997, CSFV is presumed to be introduced into Belgium from The Netherlands. Pre-emptive slaughter of herds that had been in contact with infected herds or were located in close vicinity of infected herds, was carried out around the first two outbreaks. However, this policy was not further exercised till mid-April 1997, when pre-emptive slaughter became a standard operational procedure for the rest of the epidemic. In total, 1286 pig herds were pre-emptively slaughtered. (approximately 1.1 million pigs). A total of 44 outbreaks (10%) was detected via pre-emptive slaughter. When there were clinical signs, the observed symptoms in infected herds were mainly atypical: fever, apathy, ataxia or a combination of these signs. In 322 out of 429 outbreaks (75%), detection was bases on clinical signs observed: 32% was detected by the farmer, 25% by the veterinary practitioner, 10% of the outbreaks by tracing teams and 8% by screening teams of the veterinary authorities. In 76% of the outbreaks detected by clinical signs, the farmer reported to have seen clinical symptoms for less than 1 week before diagnosis, in 22% for 1-4 weeks before diagnosis, and in 4 herds (1%) the farmer reported to have seen clinical symptoms for more than 4 weeks before diagnosis. Transportation lorries played a major role in the transmission of CSFV before the primary outbreak was diagnosed. It is estimated that approximately 39 herds were already infected before the first measures of the eradication campaign came into force. After the first measures to stop the spread of CSFV had been implemented, the distribution of the most likely routes of transmission markedly changed. In most outbreaks, a neighbourhood infection was indicated. Basically, there were two reasons for this catastrophe. Firstly, there was the extent of the period between introduction of the virus in the region and detection of the first outbreak. As a result, CSFV had opportunities to spread from one herd to another during this period. Secondly, the measures initially taken did not prove sufficient in the swine- and herd-dense region involved.
本文的目的是描述1997 - 1998年荷兰在不接种疫苗、强化监测、先发制屠宰以及在欧洲猪和猪群密度最高的地区之一实施扑杀政策的情况下,古典猪瘟(CSF)的严重疫情。首次疫情于1997年2月4日在一个母猪和育肥猪混合猪群中被发现。疫情期间共观察到429起疫情,这些猪群中约70万头猪被屠宰。其中有两个人工授精中心发生疫情,导致1680个猪群(主要位于荷兰南部)被宣布疑似感染古典猪瘟。据估计,古典猪瘟病毒(CSFV)传入该国到首次疫情诊断之间的时间约为6周。据推测,1997年2月初在运输全面停止之前,CSFV通过感染仔猪的运输从荷兰传播到了意大利和西班牙。1997年6月,据推测CSFV从荷兰传入比利时。在前两起疫情周围,对与感染猪群有接触或位于感染猪群附近的猪群实施了先发制屠宰。然而,这一政策直到1997年4月中旬才进一步实施,那时先发制屠宰成为疫情剩余阶段的标准操作程序。总共1286个猪群被先发制屠宰(约110万头猪)。通过先发制屠宰检测到44起疫情(10%)。出现临床症状时,感染猪群观察到的症状主要是非典型的:发热、冷漠、共济失调或这些症状的组合。在429起疫情中的322起(75%)中,检测是基于观察到的临床症状:32%由养殖户发现,25%由兽医发现,10%的疫情由追踪小组发现,8%由兽医当局的筛查小组发现。在通过临床症状检测到的疫情中,76%的养殖户报告在诊断前观察到临床症状的时间少于1周,22%为诊断前1 - 4周,4个猪群(1%)的养殖户报告在诊断前观察到临床症状的时间超过4周。在首次疫情诊断之前,运输卡车在CSFV传播中起了主要作用。据估计,在根除行动的首批措施生效之前,约39个猪群已经被感染。在实施阻止CSFV传播的首批措施之后,最可能的传播途径分布明显改变。在大多数疫情中,显示为邻里间感染。这场灾难基本上有两个原因。首先,病毒传入该地区到首次疫情检测之间的时间段较长。结果,在此期间CSFV有机会从一个猪群传播到另一个猪群。其次,在所涉及的猪和猪群密集地区,最初采取的措施证明是不够有效的。