Richter M, Brüser P
Abteilung-für Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Malteserkrankenhauses Bonn.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999 Nov;31(6):373-6; discussion 377. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-13555.
The aim of this study was to examine sensitivity and specificity of Durkan test in 54 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electrophysiological testing, as compared to a control group of 54 patients without clinical signs of the syndrome. Sensitivity and specificity of Durkan test alone, as well as in combination with Phalen test and Hoffmann-Tinel test, were determined. The sensitivity of Durkan test was 0.87, its specificity was 0.96. The sensitivity of Phalen test was 0.85 with a specificity of 0.96. It was discovered that the combination of Phalen with Durkan test achieved a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.96, thus equalling the respective values for electrophysiological testing (nerve conduction velocity, electromyography) which so far is regarded as the golden standard diagnostic test for carpal tunnel syndrome. If Hoffmann-Tinel test is included as a further clinical parameter, then both sensitivity and specificity reach 0.96. This study, therefore, raises the question of whether costly electrophysiological testing is in fact necessary before surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome, when the clinical tests have already proven positive.
本研究旨在对54例经电生理测试确诊为腕管综合征的患者,与54例无该综合征临床症状的对照组患者进行比较,以检验Durkan试验的敏感性和特异性。分别测定了单独Durkan试验以及Durkan试验与Phalen试验和Hoffmann-Tinel试验联合使用时的敏感性和特异性。Durkan试验的敏感性为0.87,特异性为0.96。Phalen试验的敏感性为0.85,特异性为0.96。研究发现,Phalen试验与Durkan试验联合使用时,敏感性达到0.94,特异性为0.96,这与迄今为止被视为腕管综合征金标准诊断测试的电生理测试(神经传导速度、肌电图)的相应值相当。如果将Hoffmann-Tinel试验作为进一步的临床参数纳入,那么敏感性和特异性均达到0.96。因此,本研究提出了一个问题,即在临床检查已呈阳性的情况下,对于腕管综合征手术前是否真的有必要进行昂贵的电生理测试。