• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深静脉血栓形成:早期出院策略与门诊管理

Deep Venous Thrombosis: Early Discharge Strategies and Outpatient Management.

作者信息

Baron RM, Goldhaber SZ

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1997;4(3/4):365-374. doi: 10.1023/a:1008849416842.

DOI:10.1023/a:1008849416842
PMID:10639643
Abstract

Conventional management of acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) consists of initiating continuous infusion intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) for 5 days in the hospital as well as warfarin. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) appear to confer similar protection against recurrent DVT compared with UFH but exhibit prolonged bioavailability, increased ease of dosing, and fewer side effects. The advent of LMWH has resulted in increased numbers of patients undergoing initial management of acute DVT with only several days of hospitalization. While 3-month follow-up studies with LMWH demonstrate similar efficacy and safety to UFH, longer term experience with these new agents is necessary to determine their optimal use and safety. We suggest a system for triage in the initial management of DVT patients for: (1) complete outpatient management with LMWH, or (2) short-term hospitalization for initiation of LMWH, or (3) 5-day hospitalization for treatment with UFH. A review of DVT management with LMWH and algorithms for each of these pathways are provided.

摘要

急性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的传统治疗方法包括在医院连续静脉输注普通肝素(UFH)5天以及使用华法林。与UFH相比,低分子量肝素(LMWH)似乎对复发性DVT具有相似的保护作用,但具有更长的生物利用度、更易于给药且副作用更少。LMWH的出现导致仅住院几天就接受急性DVT初始治疗的患者数量增加。虽然LMWH的3个月随访研究表明其疗效和安全性与UFH相似,但需要更长时间使用这些新药的经验来确定其最佳用途和安全性。我们建议在DVT患者的初始治疗中采用一种分诊系统:(1)使用LMWH进行完全门诊治疗,或(2)短期住院以开始使用LMWH,或(3)住院5天接受UFH治疗。本文提供了对LMWH治疗DVT的综述以及这些治疗途径中每种途径的算法。

相似文献

1
Deep Venous Thrombosis: Early Discharge Strategies and Outpatient Management.深静脉血栓形成:早期出院策略与门诊管理
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1997;4(3/4):365-374. doi: 10.1023/a:1008849416842.
2
Deep venous thrombosis: early discharge strategies and outpatient management.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1999 Apr;7(2):113-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1008873201503.
3
Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of thrombosis.低分子量肝素在血栓形成治疗中的应用
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Apr 30;9(4):225-39.
4
Low-molecular-weight heparins in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis.低分子量肝素在深静脉血栓形成治疗中的应用
Ann Pharmacother. 1998 May;32(5):588-98, 601. doi: 10.1345/aph.16450.
5
Home treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin: Long-term incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism.低分子量肝素居家治疗深静脉血栓形成:复发性静脉血栓栓塞的长期发生率
Am J Hematol. 2001 May;67(1):10-4. doi: 10.1002/ajh.1069.
6
Low molecular weight versus unfractionated heparin. A clinical and economic appraisal.低分子量肝素与普通肝素:临床与经济学评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Aug;8(2):91-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508020-00002.
7
Efficacy of a low molecular weight heparin administered intravenously or subcutaneously in comparison with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Certoparin-Study Group.与静脉注射普通肝素相比,静脉注射或皮下注射低分子量肝素治疗深静脉血栓形成的疗效。舍托肝素研究组。
Int Angiol. 1998 Sep;17(3):135-45.
8
A fixed-dose combination of low molecular weight heparin with dihydroergotamine versus adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement.低分子量肝素与双氢麦角胺固定剂量组合对比调整剂量普通肝素预防全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的研究
Thromb Haemost. 1996 Feb;75(2):246-50.
9
Outpatient management of venous thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞症的门诊管理
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1999 Apr;7(2):109-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1008821217432.
10
Anticoagulants in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.
Am J Med. 2005 Aug;118 Suppl 8A:13S-20S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.06.006.

本文引用的文献

1
Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. A controlled trial.抗凝药物治疗肺栓塞的对照试验。
Lancet. 1960 Jun 18;1(7138):1309-12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(60)92299-6.
2
Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis.
Lancet. 1997 Mar 15;349(9054):759-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)12215-7.
3
Uses of low-molecular-weight heparin.低分子量肝素的用途。
Blood Rev. 1995 Dec;9(4):213-9. doi: 10.1016/s0268-960x(95)90012-8.
4
The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis.急性深静脉血栓形成的长期临床病程。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 1;125(1):1-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-1-199607010-00001.
5
A critical pathway to treat proximal lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis.治疗下肢近端深静脉血栓形成的关键路径。
Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):283-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89486-7.
6
Variation in the management of deep vein thrombosis: implications for the potential impact of a critical pathway.深静脉血栓形成管理的差异:对关键路径潜在影响的启示
Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):278-82. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89485-5.
7
Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group.与在家皮下注射低分子量肝素相比,在医院静脉注射普通肝素治疗静脉血栓形成。塔斯曼研究小组。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):682-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341102.
8
A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis.主要在家中使用的低分子量肝素与在医院使用的普通肝素治疗近端深静脉血栓形成的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):677-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341101.
9
Shortened hospitalization by means of adjusted-dose subcutaneous heparin for deep venous thrombosis.采用调整剂量的皮下肝素治疗深静脉血栓以缩短住院时间。
Am Heart J. 1996 Feb;131(2):276-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90354-3.
10
Inhibition of hypoxic pulmonary hypertension by heparins of differing in vitro antiproliferative potency.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jun;149(6):1512-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.6.8004307.