Krarup C
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Neuroscience Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Neurol. 1999 Dec;246(12):1115-26. doi: 10.1007/s004150050529.
This review describes some of the factors that may lead to erroneous interpretations of electromyographic and nerve conduction studies. Such errors may be due either to technical or to biological factors, and it is imperative that the consequent limitations of the methods be considered in a diagnostic setting. Electrodiagnostic findings should always be interpreted in the clinical context, and since they are rarely specific for a particular disorder or pathology, it is necessary to satisfy several criteria to make a specific diagnosis. The aim of electromyographic examination is to ascertain whether weakness is due to a neurogenic lesion or to myopathy. It is, however, not sufficient to show the presence of denervation activity since this may occur in either condition. Therefore the motor unit potentials from both weak and nonaffected muscles should be examined quantitatively. Nerve conduction studies are carried out to ascertain whether motor or sensory myelinated fibers are lost, and whether the primary pathology is due to demyelination or axonal loss or to both. The nerve conduction velocity is of primary importance in this distinction. However, loss of large myelinated fibers leads to slowing of conduction; in some instances the conduction velocity may be normal if only a few large fibers are spared. In addition collateral sprouting in chronic conditions may lead to apparent sparing of motor fibers. Hence an erroneous diagnosis may be made of a sensory neuropathy if additional electromyography or other tests are not carried out. Conduction studies investigate only large myelinated fibers, and therefore in some instances there is discordance between the morphology and physiology. Acquired demyelinating neuropathies are sometimes associated with focal slowing of conduction or with conduction block. The demonstration of conduction block is important, but several requirements must be fulfilled in terms of technique, clinical context, and temporal development in order to avoid errors.
本综述描述了一些可能导致肌电图和神经传导研究错误解读的因素。此类错误可能是技术因素或生物学因素所致,在诊断过程中必须考虑到这些方法随之而来的局限性。电诊断结果应始终结合临床背景进行解读,由于它们很少对特定疾病或病理具有特异性,因此要做出特定诊断需要满足几个标准。肌电图检查的目的是确定肌无力是由神经源性病变还是肌病引起的。然而,仅显示失神经活动是不够的,因为这在两种情况下都可能出现。因此,应对无力肌肉和未受影响肌肉的运动单位电位进行定量检查。进行神经传导研究以确定运动或感觉有髓纤维是否丧失,以及原发性病理是由于脱髓鞘、轴突丧失还是两者兼而有之。神经传导速度在这种区分中至关重要。然而,大的有髓纤维丧失会导致传导减慢;在某些情况下,如果只有少数大纤维得以保留,传导速度可能正常。此外,慢性疾病中的侧支芽生可能导致运动纤维明显保留。因此,如果不进行额外的肌电图检查或其他测试,可能会对感觉神经病变做出错误诊断。传导研究仅调查大的有髓纤维,因此在某些情况下,形态学和生理学之间存在不一致。获得性脱髓鞘性神经病有时与局部传导减慢或传导阻滞有关。传导阻滞的证明很重要,但在技术、临床背景和时间发展方面必须满足几个要求,以避免错误。