• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

薄层快速自旋回波、快速液体衰减反转恢复序列及钆增强T1加权磁共振成像序列在检测多发性硬化新病灶活动中的敏感性

The sensitivity of thin-slice fast spin echo, fast FLAIR and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequences in detecting new lesion activity in multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Tubridy N, Molyneux P D, Moseley I F, Miller D H

机构信息

NMR Unit, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol. 1999 Dec;246(12):1181-5. doi: 10.1007/s004150050540.

DOI:10.1007/s004150050540
PMID:10653313
Abstract

Fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) and proton density/T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) brain images with 3-mm slices were acquired monthly for 7 months in 37 multiple sclerosis patients. New and enlarging lesions were counted and compared according to the site of lesions seen with each sequence. In addition, the number of new enhancing lesions seen on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging at the same time points was counted. All sequences used 3-mm contiguous axial slices. Overall, 126 new or enlarging lesions were seen on FSE and 135 on fast FLAIR (P = 0.25, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). Regional comparisons revealed significantly more fast FLAIR lesions only in the cortical/subcortical areas. There was a total of 295 new enhancing lesions over the same period -- a gain in the number of 'active lesions' of 234% seen with FSE and 218% with FLAIR. It is concluded that serial thin slice fast FLAIR is only slightly superior to FSE in detecting new and enlarging multiple sclerosis lesions but the difference is not sufficient to recommend that FLAIR should replace FSE in short-term, exploratory trials in MS using monthly scanning. Gadolinium-enhanced imaging is more then twice as sensitive as either FSE or fast FLAIR to new multiple sclerosis lesion activity, and enhancing lesions should provide the primary outcome measure in such studies.

摘要

对37例多发性硬化症患者,每月采集一次脑部快速液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)序列和质子密度/T2加权快速自旋回波(FSE)序列图像,层厚3毫米,共采集7个月。根据每个序列上所见病变的部位,对新出现和扩大的病变进行计数并比较。此外,还对同一时间点钆增强T1加权脑磁共振成像上所见的新强化病变数量进行计数。所有序列均采用3毫米连续轴位扫描。总体而言,FSE序列上可见126个新出现或扩大的病变,快速FLAIR序列上可见135个(P = 0.25,Wilcoxon符号秩检验)。区域比较显示,仅在皮质/皮质下区域,快速FLAIR序列发现的病变明显更多。同期共有295个新强化病变——FSE序列所见“活动性病变”数量增加了234%,快速FLAIR序列增加了218%。结论是,在检测新出现和扩大的多发性硬化症病变方面,连续薄层快速FLAIR序列仅略优于FSE序列,但这种差异不足以推荐在多发性硬化症每月扫描的短期探索性试验中用FLAIR序列取代FSE序列。钆增强成像对新的多发性硬化症病变活动的敏感性是FSE序列或快速FLAIR序列的两倍多,在这类研究中,强化病变应作为主要结局指标。

相似文献

1
The sensitivity of thin-slice fast spin echo, fast FLAIR and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequences in detecting new lesion activity in multiple sclerosis.薄层快速自旋回波、快速液体衰减反转恢复序列及钆增强T1加权磁共振成像序列在检测多发性硬化新病灶活动中的敏感性
J Neurol. 1999 Dec;246(12):1181-5. doi: 10.1007/s004150050540.
2
Multiple sclerosis: interobserver agreement in reporting active lesions on serial brain MRI using conventional spin echo, fast spin echo, fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and post-contrast T1-weighted images.多发性硬化症:使用传统自旋回波、快速自旋回波、快速液体衰减反转恢复序列及对比剂增强T1加权成像,在连续脑部磁共振成像中报告活动性病灶时的观察者间一致性。
J Neurol. 1999 Oct;246(10):920-5. doi: 10.1007/s004150050483.
3
Sensitivity and reproducibility of fast-FLAIR, FSE, and TGSE sequences for the MRI assessment of brain lesion load in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study.
J Neuroimaging. 1997 Apr;7(2):98-102. doi: 10.1111/jon19977298.
4
Serial isotropic three-dimensional fast FLAIR imaging: using image registration and subtraction to reveal active multiple sclerosis lesions.连续各向同性三维快速液体衰减反转恢复成像:利用图像配准和减法揭示活动性多发性硬化病变
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep;179(3):777-82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.3.1790777.
5
Usefulness of optimized gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging in revealing lesions of the brain.优化的钆增强快速液体衰减反转恢复磁共振成像在显示脑病变中的效用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Sep;171(3):803-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725320.
6
Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted FLAIR and fast spin-echo MRI of the spine at 3 T for evaluation of extradural lesions.3T 下钆增强脂肪饱和 T1 加权 FLAIR 与快速自旋回波 MRI 对脊柱硬膜外病变的评估比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):697-703. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4887.
7
Imaging of the spinal cord and brain in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study between fast FLAIR and fast spin echo.
J Neurol. 1997 Feb;244(2):119-24. doi: 10.1007/s004150050060.
8
Optimisation of unenhanced MRI for detection of lesions in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of five pulse sequences with variable slice thickness.用于检测多发性硬化症病变的非增强磁共振成像优化:五种不同层厚脉冲序列的比较
Neuroradiology. 1998 May;40(5):293-7. doi: 10.1007/s002340050587.
9
Spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of MR pulse sequences.多发性硬化症患者的脊髓病变:磁共振脉冲序列的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996 Sep;17(8):1555-65.
10
Quantitative assessment of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of conventional spin-echo with fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.多发性硬化症中MRI病灶负荷的定量评估。传统自旋回波与快速液体衰减反转恢复序列的比较。
Brain. 1996 Aug;119 ( Pt 4):1349-55. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.4.1349.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic value of alternative techniques to gadolinium-based contrast agents in MR neuroimaging-a comprehensive overview.基于钆的造影剂替代技术在磁共振神经成像中的诊断价值——全面综述。
Insights Imaging. 2019 Aug 23;10(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0771-1.
2
Comparison of double inversion recovery and conventional magnetic resonance brain imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and relations with disease disability.多发性硬化症患者的双反转恢复序列与传统磁共振脑成像的比较及其与疾病残疾的关系
Neuroradiol J. 2013 Apr;26(2):133-42. doi: 10.1177/197140091302600201. Epub 2013 May 10.
3
Gray matter imaging in multiple sclerosis: what have we learned?
多发性硬化症的灰质成像:我们学到了什么?
BMC Neurol. 2011 Dec 12;11:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-153.
4
Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: combined postmortem MR imaging and histopathology.多发性硬化症中的皮质病变:尸检后磁共振成像与组织病理学联合研究
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Mar;26(3):572-7.