Salkeld G, Cameron I D, Cumming R G, Easter S, Seymour J, Kurrle S E, Quine S
Social and Public Health Economics Research Group (SPHERe), Department of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
BMJ. 2000 Feb 5;320(7231):341-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7231.341.
To estimate the utility (preference for health) associated with hip fracture and fear of falling among older women.
Quality of life survey with the time trade off technique. The technique derives an estimate of preference for health states by finding the point at which respondents show no preference between a longer but lower quality of life and a shorter time in full health.
A randomised trial of external hip protectors for older women at risk of hip fracture.
194 women aged >/= 75 years enrolled in the randomised controlled trial or who were eligible for the trial but refused completed a quality of life interview face to face.
Respondents were asked to rate their own health by using the Euroqol instrument and then rate three health states (fear of falling, a "good" hip fracture, and a "bad" hip fracture) by using time trade off technique.
On an interval scale between 0 (death) and 1 (full health), a "bad" hip fracture (which results in admission to a nursing home) was valued at 0.05; a "good" hip fracture (maintaining independent living in the community) 0.31, and fear of falling 0.67. Of women surveyed, 80% would rather be dead (utility=0) than experience the loss of independence and quality of life that results from a bad hip fracture and subsequent admission to a nursing home. The differences in mean utility weights between the trial groups and the refusers were not significant. A test-retest study on 36 women found that the results were reliable with correlation coefficients within classes ranging from 0.61 to 0.88.
Among older women who have exceeded average life expectancy, quality of life is profoundly threatened by falls and hip fractures. Older women place a very high marginal value on their health. Any loss of ability to live independently in the community has a considerable detrimental effect on their quality of life.
评估老年女性髋部骨折及跌倒恐惧相关的效用(对健康的偏好)。
采用时间权衡技术的生活质量调查。该技术通过找到受访者在较长但生活质量较低与较短的完全健康时间之间无偏好的点,得出对健康状态的偏好估计值。
一项针对有髋部骨折风险的老年女性的外部髋部保护器随机试验。
194名年龄≥75岁的女性,她们参加了随机对照试验或符合试验条件但拒绝参加,完成了面对面的生活质量访谈。
要求受访者使用欧洲五维健康量表对自身健康进行评分,然后使用时间权衡技术对三种健康状态(跌倒恐惧、“良好”的髋部骨折和“不良”的髋部骨折)进行评分。
在0(死亡)至1(完全健康)的区间量表上,“不良”的髋部骨折(导致入住养老院)的效用值为0.05;“良好”的髋部骨折(在社区维持独立生活)为0.31,跌倒恐惧为0.67。在接受调查的女性中,80%宁愿死亡(效用值=0),也不愿经历因不良髋部骨折及随后入住养老院而导致的独立性和生活质量丧失。试验组和拒绝者之间的平均效用权重差异不显著。对36名女性进行的重测研究发现,结果可靠,组内相关系数在0.61至0.88之间。
在超过平均预期寿命的老年女性中,跌倒和髋部骨折严重威胁生活质量。老年女性对自身健康的边际价值非常高。在社区中任何独立生活能力的丧失都会对她们的生活质量产生相当大的不利影响。