Burge P S, Pantin C F, Newton D T, Gannon P F, Bright P, Belcher J, McCoach J, Baldwin D R, Burge C B
Occupational Lung Disease Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, UK.
Occup Environ Med. 1999 Nov;56(11):758-64. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.11.758.
If asthma is due to work exposures there must be a relation between these exposures and the asthma. Asthma causes airway hyperresponsiveness and obstruction; the obstruction can be measured with portable meters, which usually measure peak expiratory flow, or sometimes forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). These can be measured serially (for instance 2 hourly) over several weeks at and away from work. Once occupational asthma develops, the asthma will be induced by many non-specific triggers common to non-occupational asthma. The challenge is to identify changes in peak expiratory flow due to work among other non-occupational causes. Standard statistical tests have been found to be insensitive or non-specific, principally because of the variable period for deterioration to occur after exposure, and the sometimes prolonged time for recovery to occur, such that days away from work may initially have lower measurements than days at work. A computer assisted diagnostic aid (Oasys) has been developed to separate occupational from non-occupational causes of airflow obstruction. Oasys-2 is based on a discriminant analysis, and achieved a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of at least 94%; therefore peak expiratory flow monitoring combined with Oasys-2 analysis is better to confirm than to exclude occupational asthma. A neural network version in development has improved on this. Both have been based on expert interpretation of peak flow measurements plotted as daily maximum, mean, and minimum, with the first reading at work taken as the first reading of the day. Oasys has been evaluated with independent criteria against measurements made in a wide range of occupational situations. Oasys is sufficiently developed to be the initial method for the confirmation, although less so for exclusion of occupational asthma.
如果哮喘是由工作接触引起的,那么这些接触与哮喘之间必然存在关联。哮喘会导致气道高反应性和阻塞;阻塞情况可用便携式仪器进行测量,这些仪器通常测量呼气峰值流速,有时也测量一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。这些指标可在工作时和非工作时连续数周(例如每两小时一次)进行测量。一旦患上职业性哮喘,许多非职业性哮喘常见的非特异性触发因素也会诱发哮喘。难题在于识别出工作导致的呼气峰值流速变化与其他非职业性原因导致的变化。已发现标准统计测试不够灵敏或缺乏特异性,主要原因是接触后病情恶化的时间不定,恢复时间有时也较长,以至于缺勤日的测量值最初可能低于工作日。已开发出一种计算机辅助诊断工具(Oasys),用于区分气流阻塞的职业性和非职业性原因。Oasys - 2基于判别分析,灵敏度达75%,特异性至少为94%;因此,呼气峰值流速监测结合Oasys - 2分析用于确诊职业性哮喘比排除职业性哮喘效果更好。正在开发的神经网络版本在此基础上有所改进。两者均基于对以每日最大值、平均值和最小值绘制的峰值流速测量值的专家解读,工作时的首次测量值作为当天的首次读数。Oasys已根据独立标准针对广泛职业场景下的测量结果进行了评估。Oasys已足够完善,可作为确诊职业性哮喘的初始方法,不过在排除职业性哮喘方面效果稍逊。