Asmundson G J, Frombach I, McQuaid J, Pedrelli P, Lenox R, Stein M B
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Behav Res Ther. 2000 Feb;38(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00061-3.
Recent exploratory [Taylor, S., Kuch, K., Koch, W. J., Crockett, D. J., & Passey, G. (1998). The structure of posttraumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 154-160.] and confirmatory [Buckley, T. C., Blanchard, E. B., & Hickling, E. J. (1998). A confirmatory factor analysis of posttraumatic stress symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 1091-1099; King, D. W., Leskin, G. A., King, L. A., & Weathers, F. W. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the clinician-administered PTSD scale: evidence for the dimensionality of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Assessment, 10, 90-96.] factor analytic investigations suggest that the three symptom clusters of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual [4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.] may not provide the best conceptualization of symptom dimensionality. However, the alternative models have not been in agreement, nor have they been compared against each other or models based on the DSM-IV. The purpose of the present investigation was to test a series of dimensional models suggested by these recent factor analytic investigations and the DSM-IV. Using data collected with the PTSD Checklist--Civilian Version [Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Huska, J. A., & Keane, T. M. (1994). PCL-C for DSM-IV. Boston: National Center for PTSD--Behavioral Science Division.] from 349 referrals to a primary care medical clinic, we used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate a: (1) hierarchical four-factor model, (2) four-factor intercorrelated model, (3) hierarchical three-factor model, (4) three-factor intercorrelated model, and (5) hierarchical two-factor model. The hierarchical four-factor model (comprising four first-order factors corresponding to reexperiencing, avoidance, numbing, and hyperarousal all subsumed by a higher-order general factor) provided the best overall fit to the data; although, all models met some standards specified for good model fit. More research is needed to establish the dimensional nature of PTSD symptoms and to assess whether identified dimensions differ as a function of the trauma experience. Implications for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment are also discussed.
近期的探索性研究[泰勒,S.,库奇,K.,科赫,W. J.,克罗克特,D. J.,& 帕西,G.(1998年)。创伤后应激症状的结构。《变态心理学杂志》,107,154 - 160页]以及验证性研究[巴克利,T. C.,布兰查德,E. B.,& 希克林,E. J.(1998年)。创伤后应激症状的验证性因素分析。《行为研究与治疗》,36,1091 - 1099页;金,D. W.,莱斯金,G. A.,金,L. A.,& 韦瑟斯,F. W.(1998年)。临床医生施测的创伤后应激障碍量表的验证性因素分析:创伤后应激障碍维度性的证据。《心理评估》,10,90 - 96页]表明,《诊断与统计手册》[第4版;《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版;美国精神病学协会(1994年)。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版)。华盛顿特区:作者]中定义的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的三个症状群可能无法提供症状维度的最佳概念化。然而,替代模型并未达成一致,它们也未相互比较,也未与基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的模型进行比较。本研究的目的是检验这些近期因素分析研究和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版所提出的一系列维度模型。使用从一家初级保健医疗诊所的349名转诊患者那里收集的创伤后应激障碍清单——平民版[韦瑟斯,F. W.,利兹,B. T.,胡斯卡,J. A.,& 基恩,T. M.(1994年)。用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的平民版创伤后应激障碍清单。波士顿:国家创伤后应激障碍中心——行为科学部]的数据,我们使用验证性因素分析来评估:(1)层次四因素模型,(2)四因素相互关联模型,(3)层次三因素模型,(4)三因素相互关联模型,以及(5)层次两因素模型。层次四因素模型(由四个一阶因素组成,分别对应于重新体验、回避、麻木和过度警觉,所有这些都包含在一个高阶一般因素之下)对数据的整体拟合最佳;尽管所有模型都符合一些规定的良好模型拟合标准。需要更多研究来确定创伤后应激障碍症状的维度性质,并评估所确定的维度是否因创伤经历而异。还讨论了对评估、诊断和治疗的影响。