van Dijk M, de Boer J B, Koot H M, Tibboel D, Passchier J, Duivenvoorden H J
Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pain. 2000 Feb;84(2-3):367-77. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00239-0.
The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the COMFORT scale as a postoperative pain instrument for children aged 0-3 years. Subjects were 158 neonates and toddlers after major abdominal or thoracic surgery. Trained nurses rated the children's pain at 3, 6 and 9 h postoperative on the Pediatric Surgical Intensive Care Unit using the COMFORT and a VAS for pain. Interrater reliability of the COMFORT items proved to be good (Kappa 0.63-0.93) for all items with the exception of the item 'Respiratory response', which was moderate (Kappa 0.54). LISREL analyses showed that the structure of the COMFORT data was best represented by three latent variables: COMFORT 'behaviour' with loadings from the behavioural items (Alertness, Calmness, Respiratory response/Crying, Physical movement, Muscle tone and Facial tension) and separate latent variables for 'Heart rate baseline' (HR) and 'Mean arterial blood pressure baseline' (MAP). Factor loadings of the items were invariant across time, indicating stability of the structure. The latent variables COMFORT 'behaviour' and VAS pain were highly interrelated indicating congruent validity. Stability of COMFORT 'behaviour' and VAS pain was moderate which might be due to varying painful episodes in this sample. HR and MAP, although stable across time, were weakly related to VAS pain and COMFORT 'behaviour'. These findings support the use of the COMFORT 'behaviour' scale to assess postoperative pain in neonates and infants.
本研究的目的是测试COMFORT量表作为0至3岁儿童术后疼痛评估工具的可靠性和有效性。研究对象为158名接受腹部或胸部大手术的新生儿和幼儿。经过培训的护士在小儿外科重症监护病房,于术后3小时、6小时和9小时,使用COMFORT量表和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对儿童的疼痛程度进行评分。除“呼吸反应”项目的评分者间信度为中等(Kappa值0.54)外,COMFORT量表所有项目的评分者间信度均良好(Kappa值0.63 - 0.93)。线性结构关系模型(LISREL)分析表明,COMFORT量表数据的结构最佳地由三个潜在变量表示:COMFORT“行为”,由行为项目(警觉性、平静度、呼吸反应/哭闹、身体活动、肌张力和面部紧张度)的负荷表示,以及单独的“心率基线”(HR)和“平均动脉血压基线”(MAP)潜在变量。各项目的因子负荷在不同时间是不变的,表明结构的稳定性。潜在变量COMFORT“行为”和VAS疼痛评分高度相关,表明具有同等效度。COMFORT“行为”和VAS疼痛评分的稳定性为中等,这可能是由于该样本中疼痛发作情况不同所致。HR和MAP虽然在不同时间是稳定的,但与VAS疼痛评分和COMFORT“行为”的相关性较弱。这些研究结果支持使用COMFORT“行为”量表来评估新生儿和婴儿的术后疼痛。